Hogan Anthony R, Lineen Edward B, Perez Eduardo A, Neville Holly L, Thompson William R, Sola Juan E
DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery and Division of Trauma/Critical Care, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla 33136, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jun;44(6):1236-41; discussion 1241. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.039.
We sought to define the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in pediatric vascular injuries.
All neck and extremity CTAs performed in pediatric patients at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed from 2001 to 2007.
Overall, 78 patients were identified with an average age of 15.0 +/- 4.0 (0-18 years). Males outnumbered females 3.6:1. CTA was performed for 41 penetrating and 37 blunt traumas. Most penetrating injuries were due to missile wounds (71%) or stab wounds (17%). Eleven major vascular injuries resulted from penetrating trauma. For penetrating trauma, CTA was 100% sensitive and 93% specific. CTA for penetrating trauma had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. Most blunt injuries were due to motor vehicle accidents (57%), followed by pedestrian hit by car (27%). Eight major vascular injuries resulted from blunt trauma. For blunt trauma, CTA was 88% sensitive and 100% specific. CTA for blunt trauma had a PPV of 100% and an NPV of 97%. The accuracy for penetrating and blunt trauma was 95% and 97%, respectively.
CTA is highly sensitive, specific, and accurate for pediatric neck and extremity vascular trauma.
我们试图确定计算机断层血管造影(CTA)在小儿血管损伤中的敏感性和特异性。
回顾了2001年至2007年在一级创伤中心对小儿患者进行的所有颈部和四肢CTA检查。
总共确定了78例患者,平均年龄为15.0±4.0岁(0至18岁)。男性与女性的比例为3.6:1。进行CTA检查的有41例穿透伤和37例钝性伤。大多数穿透伤是由枪伤(71%)或刺伤(17%)所致。11例主要血管损伤由穿透伤引起。对于穿透伤,CTA的敏感性为100%,特异性为93%。穿透伤CTA的阳性预测值(PPV)为85%,阴性预测值(NPV)为100%。大多数钝性伤是由机动车事故(57%)引起的,其次是行人被汽车撞击(27%)。8例主要血管损伤由钝性伤引起。对于钝性伤,CTA的敏感性为88%,特异性为100%。钝性伤CTA的PPV为100%,NPV为97%。穿透伤和钝性伤的准确率分别为95%和97%。
CTA对小儿颈部和四肢血管创伤具有高度敏感性、特异性和准确性。