Osborn Timothy M, Bell R Bryan, Qaisi Waleed, Long William B
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service, Legacy Emanuel Hospital and Health Center, Portland, Oregon, USA.
J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1466-71. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181271b32.
Improvements in imaging technology, particularly computed tomographic angiography (CTA), have altered the management of patients with penetrating injuries in the neck. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate our 5-year experience with the management of penetrating injuries to the neck, to the further elucidate the role of CTA in clinical decision making, and to assess treatment outcome.
Clinical variables were collected and evaluated on all patients with penetrating injuries to the neck presenting to the Legacy Emanuel Hospital Trauma Service from 2000 to 2005. For comparison, the patients were divided into two groups based upon whether the patient had received a CTA before operative intervention: group 1, CTA; group 2, no CTA. A statistical analysis using the Fisher exact test and t test was performed to analyze whether the rate of neck exploration or the findings at the time of neck dissection were significantly different between the groups.
Of the 120 consecutive patients with penetrating injuries to the neck, 55 were excluded from the study because the injury was superficial, the patient died before operative intervention, or they underwent emergent neck exploration to control hemorrhage. Sixty-five patients with neck injuries penetrating the platysma were identified that met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Group 1 (CTA) consisted of 24 patients and group 2 (no CTA) had 41 patients. Group 1 (CTA) had significantly fewer formal neck explorations (N = 6) compared with group 2 (no CTA) (N = 27) (p < 0.01). All six of the operations in the CTA group had clear indications for and positive findings on surgical exploration, and there were no clinically significant missed injuries. Of the 27 patients in group 2 who underwent neck exploration, only 14 had a positive finding, 4 of which were simply superficial bleeding vessels, yielding a rate of negative neck exploration of 48%, compared with 0% for group 1 (p < 0.01). The number of adjunctive studies such as esophagography, angiography, and various endoscopic procedures were similar in both groups.
The management of stable patients with penetrating injuries to the neck that penetrate the platysma has evolved at our institution into selective surgical intervention based on clinical examination and CTA. The use of CTA has resulted in fewer formal neck explorations and virtual elimination of negative exploratory surgery.
成像技术的进步,尤其是计算机断层血管造影(CTA),已经改变了颈部穿透伤患者的治疗方式。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估我们在颈部穿透伤治疗方面的5年经验,进一步阐明CTA在临床决策中的作用,并评估治疗结果。
收集并评估了2000年至2005年期间在遗产伊曼纽尔医院创伤科就诊的所有颈部穿透伤患者的临床变量。为了进行比较,根据患者在手术干预前是否接受CTA将患者分为两组:第1组,CTA;第2组,未接受CTA。使用Fisher精确检验和t检验进行统计分析,以分析两组之间颈部探查率或颈部解剖时的发现是否存在显著差异。
在120例连续的颈部穿透伤患者中,55例被排除在研究之外,原因是损伤表浅、患者在手术干预前死亡或他们接受了紧急颈部探查以控制出血。确定了65例颈部穿透颈阔肌的损伤患者符合纳入研究的标准。第1组(CTA)由24例患者组成,第2组(未接受CTA)有41例患者。与第2组(未接受CTA)(N = 27)相比,第1组(CTA)进行的正式颈部探查明显更少(N = 6)(p < 0.01)。CTA组的所有6例手术都有明确的手术探查指征且手术探查有阳性发现,并且没有临床上显著的漏诊损伤。在第2组接受颈部探查的27例患者中,只有14例有阳性发现,其中4例只是浅表出血血管,颈部探查阴性率为48%,而第1组为0%(p < 0.01)。两组的食管造影、血管造影和各种内镜检查等辅助检查数量相似。
在我们机构,对于颈部穿透颈阔肌的稳定患者,其治疗已发展为基于临床检查和CTA的选择性手术干预。CTA的使用减少了正式的颈部探查,并几乎消除了阴性探查手术。