Alhawi Mohammad, Stewart John, Erridge Clett, Patrick Sheila, Poxton Ian R
Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK.
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Clinical Science Wing, Glenfield General Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.
J Med Microbiol. 2009 Aug;58(Pt 8):1015-1022. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.009936-0. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
Although it is desirable to identify the interactions between endotoxin/LPS and the innate immune mechanism, it is often not possible to isolate these interactions from other cell wall-related structures of protein or polysaccharide origin. There is no universally accepted method to extract different LPSs from different bacteria, and their natural state will be influenced by their interactions with the associated molecules in the bacterial outer membrane. It is now believed that Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 is the main signal transducer of classical LPS (i.e. Escherichia coli LPS), while TLR2 is used by certain non-classical LPSs. There are contradictory reports as to whether Bacteroides fragilis LPS, a non-classical LPS, signals primarily through TLR2 or TLR4. This study was designed to address this problem. Different non-purified and purified B. fragilis LPSs extracted by different methods together with different heat-killed, whole-cell populations of B. fragilis were used to elucidate the TLR specificity. All of these B. fragilis preparations showed a significant signalling specificity for TLR2 but not for TLR4. This indicates that changing the extraction methods, with or without applying a repurification procedure, and varying the cell populations do not alter the TLR specificity of B. fragilis LPS.
虽然确定内毒素/脂多糖(LPS)与固有免疫机制之间的相互作用是很有必要的,但往往无法将这些相互作用与蛋白质或多糖来源的其他细胞壁相关结构区分开来。目前尚无普遍认可的从不同细菌中提取不同LPS的方法,而且它们的天然状态会受到其与细菌外膜中相关分子相互作用的影响。现在认为,Toll样受体(TLR)4是经典LPS(即大肠杆菌LPS)的主要信号转导分子,而某些非经典LPS则利用TLR2。关于脆弱拟杆菌LPS(一种非经典LPS)主要通过TLR2还是TLR4发出信号,存在相互矛盾的报道。本研究旨在解决这一问题。采用不同方法提取的不同非纯化和纯化的脆弱拟杆菌LPS,以及不同热灭活的脆弱拟杆菌全细胞群体,用于阐明TLR特异性。所有这些脆弱拟杆菌制剂对TLR2均表现出显著的信号特异性,而对TLR4则无此特异性。这表明,无论是否进行再纯化程序,改变提取方法以及改变细胞群体,都不会改变脆弱拟杆菌LPS的TLR特异性。