Agarwal Rajiv
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 111N, 1481 West 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Hypertension. 2009 Aug;54(2):241-7. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.136366. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
Although volume excess causes hypertension, whether it also affects circadian patterns of arterial pressures among hemodialysis patients remains unknown. To test the notion of whether volume overload is associated with a unique blood pressure (BP) "signature," a posthoc analysis was performed among 145 patients participating in the Dry-Weight Reduction in Hypertensive Hemodialysis Patients randomized, controlled trial. Using 400 ambulatory BP recordings over 8 weeks composed of 35 302 measurements, the trended cosinor model was found to be the best descriptor of BP chronobiology. The trended cosinor model may be described as a pattern of sinusoidal oscillation around a straight line with an upward trend during the interdialytic period that has an intercept at the postdialysis time. Augmented volume removal therapy reduced the intercept systolic BP and increased the rate of rise in systolic BP over the interdialytic interval but had no effect on the systolic BP fluctuation (amplitude). Thus, an elevated intercept and blunted slope pattern characterize the "volume-overload BP pattern" on ambulatory BP monitoring. Similar changes were seen for diastolic BP. Augmented volume removal therapy neither restored dipping nor was associated with a lag phenomenon for either the wake or the sleep systolic BP. Lowering of systolic BP was greater than diastolic BP such that pulse pressure was reduced. An observational cohort of 37 patients followed for 6 months confirmed these findings. Randomized trials are now needed to evaluate the clinical impact of augmented volume removal therapy on hard outcomes, because reduction of pulse pressure with this simple expedient has the potential to improve survival in hemodialysis patients.
尽管容量过多会导致高血压,但在血液透析患者中,它是否也会影响动脉血压的昼夜节律模式仍不清楚。为了验证容量超负荷是否与独特的血压(BP)“特征”相关这一概念,对参与“高血压血液透析患者干体重降低”随机对照试验的145名患者进行了事后分析。利用8周内400次动态血压记录(由35302次测量组成),发现趋势余弦模型是血压时间生物学的最佳描述指标。趋势余弦模型可描述为在透析间期围绕一条直线呈正弦振荡模式,且有上升趋势,在透析后时间有一个截距。强化容量清除治疗降低了截距收缩压,并增加了透析间期收缩压的上升速率,但对收缩压波动(幅度)没有影响。因此,在动态血压监测中,截距升高和斜率变钝模式是“容量超负荷血压模式”的特征。舒张压也出现了类似变化。强化容量清除治疗既未恢复血压的勺型变化,也与清醒或睡眠时收缩压的滞后现象无关。收缩压的降低幅度大于舒张压,从而使脉压降低。对37名患者进行6个月的观察性队列研究证实了这些发现。现在需要进行随机试验来评估强化容量清除治疗对硬性结局的临床影响,因为用这种简单方法降低脉压有可能改善血液透析患者的生存率。