Gold Deborah T, Trinh Haian, Safi Wael
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Aug;25(8):1831-9. doi: 10.1185/03007990903035604.
To determine compliance and persistence with weekly risedronate and monthly ibandronate therapy.
The IMS longitudinal prescription database was used to evaluate compliance (mean medication possession ratio), persistence (days until a gap >90 days between prescriptions occurred) and cumulative drug availability (ratio of drug supply and days between first fill date and the end of the study) among patients taking weekly risedronate or monthly ibandronate over a 12-month period using three retrospective cohorts: overall sample, new to osteoporosis therapy, and new to osteoporosis therapy after initial market availability. Comparisons were made between drug groups for each measure.
Compliance was significantly different for the overall sample (80.15 +/- 18.90% for risedronate vs. 74.68 +/- 22.56% for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), and marginally different during the initial post-marketing year (p = 0.091), but not for patients new to therapy (p = 0.693). Persistence was significantly different for the overall sample (250.04 +/- 132.34 days for risedronate vs. 151.54 +/- 137.24 days for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), for patients new to therapy (154.38 +/- 135.29 days for risedronate vs. 133.33 +/- 130.36 days for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), and after initial market availability (165.00 +/- 141.58 days for risedronate vs. 133.33 +/- 130.36 days for ibandronate; p < 0.0001). Mean cumulative drug availability was significantly different for the overall sample (64.54 +/- 29.86% for risedronate vs. 43.38 +/- 32.96% for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), for patients new to therapy (40.34 +/- 31.84% for risedronate vs. 36.05 +/- 31.09% for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), and after initial market availability (43.17 +/- 33.34% for risedronate vs. 36.05 +/- 31.09% for ibandronate; p < 0.0001).
Patient compliance, persistence and cumulative drug availability were similar for monthly ibandronate and weekly risedronate dosing. Interpretations from this study are limited by assumptions of persistence based on initial drug dosing and selected refill gap length measured. Furthermore, comparisons with earlier studies are difficult, due to differences in definitions of compliance and persistence. Further studies are needed to explore factors affecting patterns of medication use, particularly the effects of patient preference, acceptance, and patient education on compliance and persistence.
确定每周服用利塞膦酸盐和每月服用伊班膦酸盐治疗的依从性和持续性。
利用IMS纵向处方数据库,通过三个回顾性队列,评估在12个月期间服用每周一次利塞膦酸盐或每月一次伊班膦酸盐的患者的依从性(平均药物持有率)、持续性(直至处方间隔超过90天的天数)和累积药物可及性(药物供应量与首次配药日期至研究结束之间天数的比值),这三个队列分别为:总体样本、骨质疏松症治疗新使用者以及初始上市后骨质疏松症治疗新使用者。对各药物组的各项指标进行比较。
总体样本的依从性存在显著差异(利塞膦酸盐为80.15±18.90%,伊班膦酸盐为74.68±22.56%;p<0.0001),在上市后最初一年差异不显著(p = 0.091),但治疗新使用者之间无差异(p = 0.693)。总体样本的持续性存在显著差异(利塞膦酸盐为250.04±132.34天,伊班膦酸盐为151.54±137.24天;p<0.0001),治疗新使用者之间也存在显著差异(利塞膦酸盐为154.38±135.29天,伊班膦酸盐为133.33±130.36天;p<0.0001),初始上市后也是如此(利塞膦酸盐为165.00±141.58天,伊班膦酸盐为133.33±130.36天;p<0.0001)。总体样本的平均累积药物可及性存在显著差异(利塞膦酸盐为64.54±29.86%,伊班膦酸盐为43.38±32.96%;p<0.0001),治疗新使用者之间也存在显著差异(利塞膦酸盐为40.34±31.84%,伊班膦酸盐为36.05±31.09%;p<0.0001),初始上市后同样存在显著差异(利塞膦酸盐为43.17±33.34%,伊班膦酸盐为36.05±31.09%;p<0.0001)。
每月服用伊班膦酸盐和每周服用利塞膦酸盐的患者依从性、持续性和累积药物可及性相似。本研究的解释受到基于初始药物剂量和所选再填充间隔长度来衡量持续性这一假设的限制。此外,由于依从性和持续性定义的差异,与早期研究进行比较较为困难。需要进一步研究以探索影响用药模式的因素,特别是患者偏好、接受度以及患者教育对依从性和持续性的影响。