Gold Deborah T, Safi Wael, Trinh Haian
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Dec;22(12):2383-91. doi: 10.1185/030079906X154042.
To determine how patients' preferences for weekly versus monthly bisphosphonate therapy is influenced by their knowledge of the medication's proven fracture efficacy. An additional objective is to determine whether patient adherence to therapy with weekly risedronate versus monthly ibandronate is related to patient preferences Methods: Preference data were collected for weekly versus monthly bisphosphonate therapy among women currently using bisphosphonates. In addition, the IMS longitudinal prescription database was used to evaluate adherence among patients currently taking weekly risedronate or monthly ibandronate, using three cohorts: overall sample; new to osteoporosis therapy; and 6 months after initial market availability.
More patients preferred weekly over monthly therapy (82% vs. 18% respectively, p < 0.0001) after receiving information about fracture efficacy differences. Mean compliance was significantly higher for the overall sample and the post-market group. Mean persistence for risedronate versus ibandronate patients was significantly different (p < 0.0001) for the overall sample (144.3 +/- 55.5 days vs. 100.1 +/- 67.4 days), new to therapy (103.5 +/- 66.4 days vs. 92.1 +/- 65.9 days), and post-market (104.8 +/- 67.3 days vs. 92.1 +/- 65.9 days). Adherence was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in patients taking risedronate versus ibandronate in all groups (72.7 +/- 26.4% vs. 52.8 +/- 31.5%, overall sample; 51.7 +/- 31.3% vs. 46.6 +/- 30.7%, new to therapy; 53.0 +/- 32.2% vs. 46.6 +/- 30.7%, post-market). In the persistence analyses, biases might have occurred due to the methodology of breaking down the dose of the bisphosphonate the patient received during the index month, as well as due to the selected refill gap length.
Patients preferred a weekly dosing regimen with proven vertebral and non-vertebral fracture efficacy. A monthly dosing regimen did not increase patient compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in this study. However, patient compliance, persistence and adherence are complex, and methods to increase adherence beyond dosing schedules should be further investigated.
确定患者对每周一次与每月一次双膦酸盐治疗的偏好如何受到其对药物已证实的骨折疗效的了解的影响。另一个目的是确定患者对每周一次利塞膦酸盐与每月一次伊班膦酸钠治疗的依从性是否与患者偏好相关。方法:收集目前正在使用双膦酸盐的女性对每周一次与每月一次双膦酸盐治疗的偏好数据。此外,利用IMS纵向处方数据库,使用三个队列评估目前正在服用每周一次利塞膦酸盐或每月一次伊班膦酸钠的患者的依从性:总体样本;骨质疏松症治疗新手;以及初始上市后6个月。
在收到有关骨折疗效差异的信息后,更多患者更喜欢每周一次的治疗而非每月一次的治疗(分别为82%对18%,p<0.0001)。总体样本和上市后组的平均依从性显著更高。利塞膦酸盐患者与伊班膦酸钠患者的总体样本(144.3±55.5天对100.1±67.4天)、治疗新手(103.5±66.4天对92.1±65.9天)和上市后(104.8±67.3天对92.1±65.9天)的平均持续时间存在显著差异(p<0.0001)。在所有组中,服用利塞膦酸盐的患者的依从性显著高于服用伊班膦酸钠的患者(总体样本中为72.7±26.4%对52.8±31.5%;治疗新手为51.7±31.3%对46.6±30.7%;上市后为53.0±32.2%对46.6±30.7%,p<0.0001)。在持续时间分析中,由于分解患者在索引月接受的双膦酸盐剂量的方法以及所选的再填充间隔长度,可能出现了偏差。
患者更喜欢具有已证实的椎体和非椎体骨折疗效的每周给药方案。在本研究中,每月给药方案并未提高患者对双膦酸盐治疗的依从性和持续时间。然而,患者的依从性、持续时间和坚持性很复杂,应进一步研究提高依从性的方法,而不仅仅是给药时间表。