• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

German criteria for selection of hearing protectors in the interest of good signal audibility.

作者信息

Liedtke Martin

机构信息

Ergonomics-Physical Environmental Factors Division, Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BGIA), Sankt Augustin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(2):163-74. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076797.

DOI:10.1080/10803548.2009.11076797
PMID:19534849
Abstract

The German transport and personal protective equipment (PPE) technical committees of the German Social Accident Insurance have laid down criteria, which have since become established, for hearing protectors to be used in railway systems and road traffic in Germany: only hearing protectors which do not significantly impair the audibility of auditory warning signals may be used. In addition, the Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (BGIA) has proposed a simple criterion for the selection of hearing protectors for workplaces outside railway systems and road traffic which perform well with regard to signal audibility (general), speech intelligibility, and perception of informative operating sound (AIP). This criterion is based upon the research carried out in the field of signal audibility in railway systems and road traffic and upon an additional study. It has been established by the German PPE technical committee and is presented here.

摘要

相似文献

1
German criteria for selection of hearing protectors in the interest of good signal audibility.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(2):163-74. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076797.
2
Effect of wearing hearing protectors on the audibility of railway warning signals - an experimental study.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018 Mar;24(1):149-159. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1375733. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
3
Performance of different types of hearing protectors undergoing high-level impulse noise.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(2):227-40. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076804.
4
Solving noise hazards of railroads.解决铁路的噪音危害。
Occup Health Saf. 2008 Jun;77(6):100, 102, 104.
5
Hearing protectors "real-world" performance and the European directive 2003/10/EC.听力保护器的“实际使用”性能与欧洲指令2003/10/EC
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(2):221-6. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076803.
6
Hearing protectors: topicality and research needs.听力保护器:现状与研究需求。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(2):141-53. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076795.
7
Ototoxic occupational exposures for a stock car racing team: I. Noise surveys.一支纳斯卡赛车车队的耳毒性职业暴露:I. 噪声调查。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 Aug;2(8):383-90. doi: 10.1080/15459620591009644.
8
Noise exposure and noise induced hearing loss among Kuala Lumpur traffic point duty personnel.吉隆坡交通执勤人员的噪声暴露与噪声性听力损失
Med J Malaysia. 2007 Jun;62(2):152-5.
9
Putting the personal back into PPE: hearing protector effectiveness.
Occup Health Saf. 2007 Jun;76(6):90, 92, 94.
10
Is it reasonable to expect individuals to wear hearing protectors for extended periods?
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(2):175-81. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076798.