Suppr超能文献

是生产力推动了多样性,还是反之亦然?对河流中多变量生产力-多样性假说的一项检验。

Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa? A test of the multivariate productivity-diversity hypothesis in streams.

作者信息

Cardinale Bradley J, Bennett Danuta M, Nelson Craig E, Gross Kevin

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2009 May;90(5):1227-41. doi: 10.1890/08-1038.1.

Abstract

The idea that productivity regulates species diversity is deeply ingrained in the field of ecology. Yet, over the past few decades, an increasing number of experiments have shown that species diversity controls, rather than simply responds to, biomass production. These contrasting perspectives have led to a seeming paradox: Is diversity the cause or the consequence of biological production? Here we present empirical evidence for the multivariate productivity-diversity (MPD) hypothesis, which argues that differing perspectives on productivity-diversity relationships can be resolved by recognizing that historical research has focused on how resource supply regulates both the productivity and richness of local competitors, whereas more recent studies have focused on how the richness of a colonist pool regulates the efficiency by which resources are captured and converted into new tissue. The MPD hypothesis predicts that three pathways operate concurrently to generate productivity diversity relationships in nature: (1) resource supply directly limits the standing biomass and/or rate of new production by primary producers, (2) producer biomass is directly influenced by the richness of species that locally compete for resources, and (3) resource supply rate indirectly affects producer biomass by influencing the fraction of species from a colonist pool that locally coexist. To examine whether this set of pathways explains covariation between productivity and diversity in natural streams, we used nutrient-diffusing agar "patches" to manipulate resource supply rates in 20 streams throughout the Sierra Nevada mountain range, California, USA. We then measured the fraction of periphyton species from the stream colonist pool co-occurring on each nutrient patch, as well as the standing biomass and rates of primary production. Natural patterns of covariation agreed with predictions of the MPD hypothesis. Algal biomass was an increasing function of nutrient supply, and an increasing function of local richness. The fraction of species from the colonist pool found co-occurring on a patch was a concave-down function of nutrient supply, causing nutrients to indirectly affect biomass via control over local richness. These results suggest that the MPD hypothesis is a viable explanation of patterns of diversity and productivity in natural stream ecosystems, and that it has potential to merge the historical view that productivity drives diversity with a parallel view that diversity drives productivity.

摘要

生产力调节物种多样性这一观点在生态学领域中根深蒂固。然而,在过去几十年里,越来越多的实验表明,物种多样性控制着生物量生产,而不仅仅是对其做出响应。这些截然不同的观点导致了一个看似矛盾的问题:多样性是生物生产的原因还是结果?在此,我们为多变量生产力 - 多样性(MPD)假说提供了实证证据,该假说认为,通过认识到历史研究聚焦于资源供应如何调节本地竞争者的生产力和丰富度,而近期研究则聚焦于殖民者库的丰富度如何调节资源捕获并转化为新组织的效率,就可以解决关于生产力 - 多样性关系的不同观点。MPD假说预测,有三条途径同时起作用,在自然界中产生生产力 - 多样性关系:(1)资源供应直接限制初级生产者的现存生物量和/或新生产速率;(2)生产者生物量直接受到本地竞争资源物种丰富度的影响;(3)资源供应速率通过影响殖民者库中在本地共存的物种比例,间接影响生产者生物量。为了检验这组途径是否能解释天然溪流中生产力与多样性之间的协变关系,我们在美国加利福尼亚内华达山脉的20条溪流中,使用营养扩散琼脂“斑块”来操纵资源供应速率。然后,我们测量了来自溪流殖民者库的周丛生物物种在每个营养斑块上共同出现的比例,以及现存生物量和初级生产速率。协变的自然模式与MPD假说的预测一致。藻类生物量是营养供应的增函数,也是本地丰富度的增函数。在一个斑块上共同出现的来自殖民者库的物种比例是营养供应的向下凹函数,这使得营养物质通过控制本地丰富度间接影响生物量。这些结果表明,MPD假说是对天然溪流生态系统中多样性和生产力模式的一个可行解释,并且它有可能将生产力驱动多样性的历史观点与多样性驱动生产力的平行观点融合起来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验