Suppr超能文献

紧急避孕的权利。

Rights to emergency contraception.

作者信息

Weisberg Edith, Fraser Ian S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Aug;106(2):160-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.031. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

Abstract

Emergency contraception (EC) provides women with a safe means of preventing pregnancy following unprotected sexual intercourse or potential contraceptive failure, and is accepted as a legitimate method of fertility control. The right of women to access EC, along with other contraceptive methods, needs to be affirmed. The consequences of unintended pregnancy are serious, imposing appreciable burdens on children, women, men, and families. Every child has the right to be a wanted child and not enter this world because its mother was denied access to EC. For maximum effectiveness, barriers to access must be removed. It is essential that EC pills are available over-the-counter with no minimum age for access. There is a tension between the rights of women to access EC without medical or legal intervention and the rights of providers who have a conscientious objection to provision on religious or moral grounds. The principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, and beneficence all weigh in favor of the rights of a woman faced with the possibility of an unintended pregnancy to unrestricted access to EC against providers whose religious views are opposed to this.

摘要

紧急避孕为女性提供了一种在无保护性行为或潜在避孕失败后预防怀孕的安全方法,并且被视为一种合理的生育控制手段。女性获取紧急避孕以及其他避孕方法的权利需要得到确认。意外怀孕的后果很严重,会给儿童、女性、男性和家庭带来相当大的负担。每个孩子都有权成为一个被期待出生的孩子,而不是因为其母亲无法获得紧急避孕而来到这个世界。为了达到最大效果,必须消除获取紧急避孕的障碍。至关重要的是,紧急避孕药应在非处方情况下可获得,且没有获取的最低年龄限制。在女性无需医疗或法律干预即可获取紧急避孕的权利与基于宗教或道德理由而出于良心拒绝对其提供的提供者的权利之间存在矛盾。自主、不伤害和行善的原则都倾向于面临意外怀孕可能性的女性不受限制地获取紧急避孕的权利,而反对那些宗教观点与此相悖的提供者的权利。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验