Suppr超能文献

烧伤研究中使用的描述性和推断性统计方法。

Descriptive and inferential statistical methods used in burns research.

作者信息

Al-Benna Sammy, Al-Ajam Yazan, Way Benjamin, Steinstraesser Lars

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery and Burn Centre, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Burns. 2010 May;36(3):343-6. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.04.030. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Burns research articles utilise a variety of descriptive and inferential methods to present and analyse data. The aim of this study was to determine the descriptive methods (e.g. mean, median, SD, range, etc.) and survey the use of inferential methods (statistical tests) used in articles in the journal Burns.

METHODS

This study defined its population as all original articles published in the journal Burns in 2007. Letters to the editor, brief reports, reviews, and case reports were excluded. Study characteristics, use of descriptive statistics and the number and types of statistical methods employed were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 51 articles analysed, 11(22%) were randomised controlled trials, 18(35%) were cohort studies, 11(22%) were case control studies and 11(22%) were case series. The study design and objectives were defined in all articles. All articles made use of continuous and descriptive data. Inferential statistics were used in 49(96%) articles. Data dispersion was calculated by standard deviation in 30(59%). Standard error of the mean was quoted in 19(37%). The statistical software product was named in 33(65%). Of the 49 articles that used inferential statistics, the tests were named in 47(96%). The 6 most common tests used (Student's t-test (53%), analysis of variance/co-variance (33%), chi(2) test (27%), Wilcoxon & Mann-Whitney tests (22%), Fisher's exact test (12%)) accounted for the majority (72%) of statistical methods employed. A specified significance level was named in 43(88%) and the exact significance levels were reported in 28(57%).

CONCLUSION

Descriptive analysis and basic statistical techniques account for most of the statistical tests reported. This information should prove useful in deciding which tests should be emphasised in educating burn care professionals. These results highlight the need for burn care professionals to have a sound understanding of basic statistics, which is crucial in interpreting and reporting data. Advice should be sought from professionals in the fields of biostatistics and epidemiology when using more advanced statistical techniques.

摘要

背景

烧伤研究文章运用多种描述性和推断性方法来呈现和分析数据。本研究的目的是确定描述性方法(如均值、中位数、标准差、范围等),并调查《烧伤》杂志文章中所使用的推断性方法(统计检验)。

方法

本研究将其总体定义为2007年发表在《烧伤》杂志上的所有原创文章。给编辑的信、简短报告、综述和病例报告被排除在外。对研究特征、描述性统计的使用以及所采用的统计方法的数量和类型进行了评估。

结果

在分析的51篇文章中,11篇(22%)为随机对照试验,18篇(35%)为队列研究,11篇(22%)为病例对照研究,11篇(22%)为病例系列。所有文章都明确了研究设计和目的。所有文章都使用了连续性和描述性数据。49篇(96%)文章使用了推断性统计。30篇(59%)通过标准差计算数据离散度。19篇(37%)引用了均值标准误。33篇(65%)提及了统计软件产品。在使用推断性统计的49篇文章中,47篇(96%)明确了检验方法。所使用的6种最常见检验方法(学生t检验(53%)、方差/协方差分析(33%)、卡方检验(27%)、威尔科克森和曼 - 惠特尼检验(22%)、费舍尔精确检验(12%))占所采用统计方法的大部分(72%)。43篇(88%)明确了指定的显著性水平,28篇(57%)报告了确切的显著性水平。

结论

描述性分析和基本统计技术占所报告统计检验的大部分。这些信息在决定烧伤护理专业人员教育中应强调哪些检验方法时应会很有用。这些结果凸显了烧伤护理专业人员对基本统计学有扎实理解的必要性,这在解释和报告数据方面至关重要。在使用更先进的统计技术时,应向生物统计学和流行病学领域的专业人员寻求建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验