Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 Dec;34 Suppl 1:S59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.05.020.
Modern views of anesthetic neurosteroid interaction with the GABA(A) receptor conceptualize steroid ligands interacting with a protein binding site on the receptor. It has generally been assumed that the steroid interaction/binding site is contained in an extracellular domain of the receptor, and that steroid interactions are of high potency, evidenced by the low aqueous ligand concentrations required to achieve potentiation of channel function. We have been considering implications of the observations that steroids are quite lipophilic and that recently identified putative steroid binding sites are in transmembrane domains of the receptor. Accordingly, we expect that both the effective plasma membrane steroid concentration and steroid pharmacophore properties will contribute to steady-state potency and to the lifetime of steroid actions following removal of free aqueous steroid. Here we review our recent studies that address the evidence that membrane partitioning and intracellular accumulation are non-specific contributors to the effects of anesthetic steroids at GABA(A) receptors. We compare and contrast the profile of anesthetic steroids with that of sulfated steroids that negatively regulate GABA(A) receptor function. These studies give rise to the view that the inherent affinity of anesthetic steroid for GABA(A) receptors is very low; low effective aqueous concentrations are accounted for by lipid partitioning. This yields a very different picture of the interaction of neurosteroids with the GABA(A) receptor than that of steroid interactions with classical intracellular steroid receptors, which exhibit inherently high affinity. These considerations have practical implications for actions of endogenous neurosteroids. Lipophilicity will tend to promote autocrine actions of neurosteroids at GABA(A) receptors within cells that synthesize neurosteroids, and lipophilic retention will limit intercellular diffusion from the source of steroid synthesis. Lipophilicity and steroid access to the receptor binding sites also must be considerations in drug design if drugs are to effectively reach the target GABA(A) receptor site.
现代观点认为,麻醉神经甾体与 GABA(A) 受体的相互作用将甾体配体与受体上的蛋白质结合位点相互作用。一般认为,甾体相互作用/结合位点包含在受体的细胞外结构域中,并且甾体相互作用具有高效力,这一点从实现通道功能增强所需的低水相配体浓度得到证明。我们一直在考虑这样的观察结果的影响,即甾体具有相当的亲脂性,并且最近确定的假定甾体结合位点位于受体的跨膜结构域中。因此,我们预计有效质膜甾体浓度和甾体药效基团特性将有助于稳态效力,并有助于在去除游离水相甾体后甾体作用的寿命。在这里,我们回顾了我们最近的研究,这些研究涉及到证据表明,膜分配和细胞内积累是非麻醉甾体在 GABA(A)受体上作用的非特异性贡献。我们比较并对比了麻醉甾体与负调节 GABA(A)受体功能的硫酸酯甾体的作用模式。这些研究产生了这样的观点,即麻醉甾体对 GABA(A)受体的固有亲和力非常低;低有效水相浓度是由脂质分配解释的。这与甾体与经典细胞内甾体受体相互作用的情况形成了鲜明对比,后者表现出固有的高亲和力。这些考虑对内源性神经甾体的作用具有实际意义。亲脂性将倾向于促进细胞内合成神经甾体的细胞内 GABA(A) 受体的神经甾体自分泌作用,并且亲脂性保留将限制甾体合成源的细胞间扩散。亲脂性和甾体进入受体结合位点也必须在药物设计中加以考虑,如果药物要有效地到达靶 GABA(A)受体位点的话。