Sturgeon Catharine M, Berger Peter, Bidart Jean-Michel, Birken Steven, Burns Chris, Norman Robert J, Stenman Ulf-Håkan
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.
Clin Chem. 2009 Aug;55(8):1484-91. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.124578. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
The 1st WHO International Reference Reagents (IRRs) for 6 human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-related molecular variants, highly purified and calibrated in substance concentrations by the IFCC Working Group for hCG, permit experimental elucidation of what commercially available hCG methods measure in molar terms and enable assessment of their fitness for clinical purposes.
Pools containing known amounts of the IRRs spiked into normal human serum were issued to participants through the UK National External Quality Assessment Service for hCG for a period of 7 years. Among 16 assays used, 4 recognized only hCG, whereas 6 recognized hCG and its free beta-subunit (hCGbeta), and 6 recognized hCG, hCGbeta, and the beta core fragment.
Differences in calibration of current hCG assays are moderate. Mean recovery of the current International Standard (IS), hCG IS 75/589, was 107% (range 93% to 126%), whereas that of the IRR 99/688 for hCG was 139% (range 109%-164%). Between-method variation for the latter (CV 12.3%) was also greater than for IS 75/589 (CV 8.8%). Recognition of hCGbeta varied markedly (CV 37%). Most assays overestimated it, but 2 RIAs produced results that were slight underestimations. Recognition of the beta core fragment was even more variable (CV 57%) and was closest to equimolarity for the RIAs.
Assays for hCG show considerable variation in their recognition of various forms of hCG, and this variability is the most important cause of method-related differences in hCG results in serum and an even more important cause of method-related differences in urine measurements. Equimolar recognition of the major hCG isoforms is essential if between-method comparability for hCG is to be improved.
世界卫生组织(WHO)的首批6种人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)相关分子变体国际参考试剂(IRRs),由国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)hCG工作组进行了高度纯化并以物质浓度校准,有助于从摩尔角度通过实验阐明市售hCG检测方法所测量的物质,并能够评估其对临床目的的适用性。
将含有已知量IRRs并添加到正常人血清中的样本池,通过英国国家hCG外部质量评估服务机构发放给参与者,为期7年。在使用的16种检测方法中,4种仅识别hCG,6种识别hCG及其游离β亚基(hCGβ),6种识别hCG、hCGβ和β核心片段。
当前hCG检测方法在校准方面的差异适中。当前国际标准品(IS)hCG IS 75/589的平均回收率为107%(范围93%至126%),而hCG的IRR 99/688的平均回收率为139%(范围109% - 164%)。后者的方法间变异系数(CV 12.3%)也大于IS 75/589(CV 8.8%)。对hCGβ的识别差异显著(CV 37%)。大多数检测方法高估了它,但2种放射免疫分析(RIA)产生的结果略有低估。对β核心片段的识别变异更大(CV 57%),并且对于RIA而言最接近等摩尔比。
hCG检测方法在识别各种形式的hCG方面存在相当大的差异,这种变异性是血清中hCG结果方法相关差异的最重要原因,也是尿液测量中方法相关差异更重要的原因。如果要提高hCG检测方法之间的可比性,对等摩尔的主要hCG异构体的识别至关重要。