Saini Sameer D, Nayak Rahul S, Kuhn Latoya, Schoenfeld Philip
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0362, USA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;43(6):554-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31818242ad.
To measure knowledge and acceptance of colon polyp surveillance guidelines among gastroenterologists.
Gastroenterologists often perform surveillance colonoscopy sooner than recommended by guidelines. Lack of knowledge may be an important factor, but gastroenterologists could also simply disagree with guideline recommendations.
A 24-item multiple-choice survey was developed from the 2003 multisociety colorectal cancer screening and surveillance guideline. The survey was distributed to practicing gastroenterologists preparing for the gastroenterology board recertification examination at 2 major national gastroenterology board review courses. For each question, subjects were given a clinical scenario and asked: (1) the guideline recommendation for the scenario; (2) their usual practice in the scenario; and, (3) if they definitely knew the recommendation or were simply guessing at the correct answer. If a respondent knew the recommendation but differed in their usual practice, this was considered disagreement with the recommendation.
The survey was completed by 57.1% (116/203) of gastroenterologists preparing for 2004 recertification. Seventy-eight percent reported that they were familiar with the 2003 guideline, though only 57% reported that guidelines were "very influential" in their practice. Many did not correctly answer questions on the recommended interval for hyperplastic polyps (12%), 2 small adenomas (36%), 3 small adenomas (49%), and adenoma with high-grade dysplasia (41%). Of gastroenterologists who knew the guideline recommendations, up to 76% disagreed with the recommendations and chose to perform surveillance sooner than recommended.
Though many gastroenterologists lack knowledge about guideline recommendations for colon polyp surveillance, even those who know the recommendations often ignore them and perform surveillance colonoscopy sooner than recommended.
评估胃肠病学家对结肠息肉监测指南的了解程度和接受度。
胃肠病学家进行监测性结肠镜检查的时间往往比指南建议的要早。知识欠缺可能是一个重要因素,但胃肠病学家也可能只是不同意指南的建议。
根据2003年多学会结直肠癌筛查和监测指南编制了一份包含24个项目的多项选择题调查问卷。该问卷被分发给在两大全国性胃肠病学委员会复习课程中准备胃肠病学委员会重新认证考试的执业胃肠病学家。对于每个问题,向受试者提供一个临床病例,并询问:(1)该病例的指南建议;(2)他们在该病例中的常规做法;以及(3)他们是肯定知道建议还是只是猜测正确答案。如果受访者知道建议但在常规做法上与之不同,则被视为不同意该建议。
准备2004年重新认证的胃肠病学家中有57.1%(116/203)完成了调查。78%的人报告说他们熟悉2003年的指南,不过只有57%的人报告说指南在他们的实践中“非常有影响力”。许多人没有正确回答关于增生性息肉(12%)、2个小腺瘤(36%)、3个小腺瘤(49%)和高级别异型增生腺瘤(41%)推荐监测间隔的问题。在知道指南建议的胃肠病学家中,高达76%的人不同意这些建议,并选择比建议时间更早地进行监测。
尽管许多胃肠病学家缺乏关于结肠息肉监测指南建议的知识,但即使是那些知道这些建议的人也常常忽视它们,比建议时间更早地进行监测性结肠镜检查。