Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University, ul. Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2009 Jun;36(3):261-79. doi: 10.1007/s10928-009-9121-0. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
The majority of measures proposed to date for direct curve comparison in bioequivalence studies were investigated. These measures have often been called metrics, but in most cases this was incorrect in the mathematical sense. It was demonstrated, with a set of counter-examples, that the axioms of a metric are fulfilled only for the integral p-metric and some of its transforms. The Rescigno index and two other measures devised by Polli and McLean are the semi-metrics, lacking the triangle inequality, while others also lack symmetry. The use of the p-metric is therefore recommended, and statistical analysis is suggested as a point at which the scaling of differences might be carried out.
迄今为止提出的大多数用于生物等效性研究中直接曲线比较的方法都进行了研究。这些方法通常被称为度量标准,但在大多数情况下,从数学意义上讲这是不正确的。通过一组反例证明,度量标准的公理仅适用于积分 p 度量标准及其某些变换。Rescigno 指数和 Polli 和 McLean 设计的另外两种度量标准是半度量标准,缺乏三角形不等式,而其他度量标准也缺乏对称性。因此,建议使用 p 度量标准,并建议进行统计分析,以确定可以进行差异缩放的位置。