Suppr超能文献

当一个度量不是度量时会怎样?生物等效性研究中直接曲线比较的注意事项。

When is a metric not a metric? Remarks on direct curve comparison in bioequivalence studies.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University, ul. Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2009 Jun;36(3):261-79. doi: 10.1007/s10928-009-9121-0. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

Abstract

The majority of measures proposed to date for direct curve comparison in bioequivalence studies were investigated. These measures have often been called metrics, but in most cases this was incorrect in the mathematical sense. It was demonstrated, with a set of counter-examples, that the axioms of a metric are fulfilled only for the integral p-metric and some of its transforms. The Rescigno index and two other measures devised by Polli and McLean are the semi-metrics, lacking the triangle inequality, while others also lack symmetry. The use of the p-metric is therefore recommended, and statistical analysis is suggested as a point at which the scaling of differences might be carried out.

摘要

迄今为止提出的大多数用于生物等效性研究中直接曲线比较的方法都进行了研究。这些方法通常被称为度量标准,但在大多数情况下,从数学意义上讲这是不正确的。通过一组反例证明,度量标准的公理仅适用于积分 p 度量标准及其某些变换。Rescigno 指数和 Polli 和 McLean 设计的另外两种度量标准是半度量标准,缺乏三角形不等式,而其他度量标准也缺乏对称性。因此,建议使用 p 度量标准,并建议进行统计分析,以确定可以进行差异缩放的位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验