• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估医疗保险受益人的处方药计划体验的工具的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess Medicare beneficiaries' prescription drug plan experiences.

作者信息

Martino Steven C, Elliott Marc N, Cleary Paul D, Kanouse David E, Brown Julie A, Spritzer Karen L, Heller Amy, Hays Ron D

机构信息

RAND, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2009 Spring;30(3):41-53.

PMID:19544934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4195071/
Abstract

Using data from 335,249 Medicare beneficiaries who responded to the 2007 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey, along with data from 22 cognitive interviews, we investigated the reliability and validity of an instrument designed to assess beneficiaries' experiences with their prescription drug plans. Composite measures derived from the instrument had acceptable internal consistency and sufficient plan-level reliability to inform consumer choice, quality improvement, and payor oversight. These measures were positively associated with members' overall rating of the plan and their willingness to recommend the plan. Moreover, each was independently useful in predicting beneficiaries' global ratings of their plan. This instrument can be an important tool for helping beneficiaries to choose a plan that best meets their needs.

摘要

我们使用了335,249名回应2007年医疗保险医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)调查的医疗保险受益人的数据,以及22次认知访谈的数据,来调查一种旨在评估受益人在其处方药计划方面体验的工具的可靠性和有效性。从该工具得出的综合指标具有可接受的内部一致性和足够的计划层面可靠性,可为消费者选择、质量改进和付款方监督提供信息。这些指标与成员对计划的总体评分及其推荐该计划的意愿呈正相关。此外,每个指标在预测受益人对其计划的总体评分方面都具有独立的作用。该工具可以成为帮助受益人选择最符合其需求的计划的重要工具。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess Medicare beneficiaries' prescription drug plan experiences.一种用于评估医疗保险受益人的处方药计划体验的工具的心理测量特性。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2009 Spring;30(3):41-53.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan disenrollment reasons survey.医疗保险优势计划和处方药计划退保原因调查的心理计量学评估。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):930-939. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13160. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
Special issues addressed in the CAHPS survey of Medicare managed care beneficiaries. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.医疗保险管理式医疗受益人的CAHPS调查中涉及的特殊问题。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS69-78. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00008.
4
An overview and study of beneficiaries' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of the medicare part d benefit.医疗保险D部分受益人的知识、态度及认知概述与研究
Consult Pharm. 2015 Feb;30(2):101-11. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2015.101..
5
Experiences of care among Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD: Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey results.终末期肾病(ESRD)的 Medicare 受惠者的护理体验: Medicare 医疗保健提供者和系统的消费者评估(CAHPS)调查结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Mar;61(3):440-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
6
Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Enrollees Report Less Positive Experiences Than Their Medicare Advantage Counterparts.医疗保险处方药计划参保者报告的积极体验少于医疗保险优势计划的参保者。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar;35(3):456-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0816.
7
Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.CAHPS 1.0调查指标的心理测量特性。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS22-31. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00003.
8
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.传统医疗保险与管理式医疗保险绩效比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
9
Development of a medicare beneficiary comprehension test: assessing medicare part d beneficiaries' comprehension of their benefits.医疗保险受益人理解测试的开发:评估医疗保险D部分受益人对其福利的理解
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013 Sep;6(8):453-61.
10
The role of satisfaction and switching costs in Medicare Part D choices.满意度和转换成本在医疗保险D部分选择中的作用。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between illness burden and care experiences among Medicare beneficiaries before or after a cancer diagnosis.医疗保险受益人的癌症诊断前后的疾病负担与护理体验之间的关联。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(5):731-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Care experiences among dually enrolled older adults with cancer: SEER-CAHPS, 2005-2013.同时注册癌症的老年患者的护理体验:SEER-CAHPS,2005-2013 年。
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Oct;30(10):1137-1144. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01218-7. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
3
A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare Managed Care CAHPS: A Tool for Performance Improvement.医疗保险管理式医疗CAHPS:绩效改进工具
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):101-107.
2
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
3
Medicare Part D: simplifying the program and improving the value of information for beneficiaries.医疗保险D部分:简化该计划并提高向受益人的信息价值。
患者报告体验测量的有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1023-1035. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13187. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
The effects of survey version on patient experience scores and plan rankings.调查版本对患者体验评分和计划排名的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1016-1022. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13172. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan disenrollment reasons survey.医疗保险优势计划和处方药计划退保原因调查的心理计量学评估。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):930-939. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13160. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
6
Geographic context of black-white disparities in Medicare CAHPS patient experience measures.医疗保险 CAHPS 患者体验测量中黑-白差异的地理背景。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):275-286. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13091. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Advice to Quit Smoking and Ratings of Health Care among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65.针对65岁医疗保险受益人的戒烟建议及医疗保健评级
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):207-219. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12491. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
Comparing the Health Care Experiences of Medicare Beneficiaries with and without Depressive Symptoms in Medicare Managed Care versus Fee-for-Service.比较医疗保险管理式医疗与按服务收费模式下有和没有抑郁症状的医疗保险受益人的医疗保健经历。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51(3):1002-20. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12359. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Do Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality and Patient Experience within Medicare Plans Generalize across Measures and Racial/Ethnic Groups?医疗保险计划中的质量和患者体验方面的种族/族裔差异是否在不同指标和种族/族裔群体中普遍存在?
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50(6):1829-49. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12297. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
10
Do Experiences with Medicare Managed Care Vary According to the Proportion of Same-Race/Ethnicity/Language Individuals Enrolled in One's Contract?医疗保险管理式医疗的体验是否会因合同中同种族/民族/语言个体的参保比例而有所不同?
Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct;50(5):1649-87. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12292. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2008 May;39:1-15.
4
Medicare prescription drug benefit progress report: findings from a 2006 national survey of seniors.医疗保险处方药福利进展报告:2006年全国老年人调查结果
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w630-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w630. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
5
Beneficiary knowledge of original Medicare and Medicare managed care.受益人群对原始医疗保险和管理式医疗保险的了解。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1020-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000228019.47200.f2.
6
Assessing Medicare prescription drug plans in four states: balancing cost and access.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2006 Aug;22:1-14.
7
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey.消费者健康计划评估研究(CAHPS)2.0成人核心调查问卷的心理测量特性。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1509-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00190.x.
8
Variation in patient-reported quality among health care organizations.医疗保健机构中患者报告的质量差异。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):85-100.
9
Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.CAHPS 1.0调查指标的心理测量特性。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS22-31. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00003.
10
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.