LaDage Lara D, Roth Timothy C, Pravosudov Vladimir V
Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nev. 89557, USA.
Brain Behav Evol. 2009;73(4):253-8. doi: 10.1159/000225623. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
When correlating behavior with particular brain regions thought responsible for the behavior, a different region of the brain is usually measured as a control region. This technique is often used to relate spatial processes with the hippocampus, while concomitantly controlling for overall brain changes by measuring the remainder of the telencephalon. We have identified two methods in the literature (the HOM and TTM) that estimate the volume of the telencephalon, although the majority of studies are ambiguous regarding the method employed in measuring the telencephalon. Of these two methods, the HOM might produce an artificial correlation between the telencephalon and the hippocampus, and this bias could result in a significant overestimation of the relative hippocampal volume and a significant underestimation of the telencephalon volume, both of which are regularly used in large comparative analyses. We suggest that future studies should avoid this method and all studies should explicitly delineate the procedures used when estimating brain volumes.
在将行为与被认为对该行为负责的特定脑区进行关联时,通常会测量大脑的另一个区域作为对照区域。这项技术常被用于将空间过程与海马体联系起来,同时通过测量端脑的其余部分来控制整个大脑的变化。我们在文献中发现了两种估计端脑体积的方法(HOM和TTM),不过大多数研究在测量端脑所采用的方法上并不明确。在这两种方法中,HOM可能会在端脑和海马体之间产生人为的相关性,这种偏差可能导致相对海马体体积的显著高估和端脑体积的显著低估,而这两者在大型比较分析中经常被使用。我们建议未来的研究应避免使用这种方法,并且所有研究都应明确描述估计脑体积时所采用的程序。