Southampton University Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Fam Cancer. 2010 Mar;9(1):71-4. doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9261-9. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Genetic testing as a preliminary to adoption has been discussed in the literature [BAAF/BSHG Statement on the use of DNA testing to determine racial background], together with the medical benefits derived from such testing ASHG/ACMG Statement [Am J Hum Genetics, 66: 761-767, 2000]. But specific cases that reach court are rare. Such a case was recently discussed on national radio [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/ethicscommittee_s4_tr3.shtml], disclosing sufficient facts to allow analysis of the ethical and legal issues encountered. Furthermore, the outcome of the case, a court order to test the child in infancy, can be reviewed in the light of the current law, together with the geneticist's response to this order.
遗传检测作为领养的初步程序已经在文献中讨论过[BAAF/BSHG 关于使用 DNA 检测来确定种族背景的声明],以及这种检测带来的医学益处[ASHG/ACMG 声明[美国人类遗传学杂志,66:761-767, 2000]]。但是,此类到达法庭的具体案件很少见。最近,一个这样的案件在国家广播电台上进行了讨论[http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/ethicscommittee_s4_tr3.shtml],披露了足够的事实,以便对所遇到的伦理和法律问题进行分析。此外,可以根据现行法律以及遗传学家对该命令的回应,审查案件的结果,即命令对婴儿进行检测。