Suppr超能文献

以色列老年成年人生活满意度指数A的结构

The structure of the Life Satisfaction Index A in elderly Israeli adults.

作者信息

Shmotkin D

机构信息

Psychology Department, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1991;33(2):131-50. doi: 10.2190/ND3A-L67H-16J7-DWJT.

Abstract

Neugaraten et al.'s Life Satisfaction Index A (LSIA) is a widely used instrument for measuring subjective well-being among elderly adults, and the generalizability of its structure in different cultural contexts should be established [1]. The present study investigated the structure of the LSIA in older Israeli adults by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Exploratory factor analyses in Sample 1 (N = 267) yielded three factors of Zest, Mood Tone, and Congruence. Unlike previous studies in the United States, Zest emerged in alternate forms, labeled Zest-Via-Time and Zest-Via-Interest. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted in Sample 1 and Sample 2 (N = 154) according to Liang's [2] model specifications, assuming a second-order factor. When previously suggested factorial compositions were tested, Liang's [2] and Hoyt and Creech's [3] three-factor models fit the data, while Adams' [4] model did not. Hoyt and Creech's [3] four-factor model provided no improvement on the two, three-factor models. When the present factorial compositions were tested, a three-factor model with Zest-Via-Interest best fit Sample 1, while an alternate three-factor model with Zest-Via-Time best fit Sample 2. A four-factor model with both forms of Zest provided no improvement on the best fitting three-factor models. The results support the generalizability of a three-factor structure with a second-order factor but suggest two different variations of Zest. Cross-cultural as well as other implications concerning subjective well-being in elderly adults are discussed.

摘要

纽加拉滕等人的生活满意度指数A(LSIA)是一种广泛用于测量老年人主观幸福感的工具,应确定其结构在不同文化背景下的普遍性[1]。本研究通过探索性和验证性因素分析,对以色列老年成年人中LSIA的结构进行了调查。样本1(N = 267)的探索性因素分析产生了活力、情绪基调和谐和感三个因素。与美国之前的研究不同,活力以交替形式出现,标记为“通过时间的活力”和“通过兴趣的活力”。根据梁[2]的模型规范,在样本1和样本2(N = 154)中进行了验证性因素分析,假定为二阶因素。当测试先前建议的因子构成时,梁[2]以及霍伊特和克里奇[3]的三因素模型拟合数据,而亚当斯[4]的模型则不然。霍伊特和克里奇[3]的四因素模型并未在这两个三因素模型上有所改进。当测试当前的因子构成时,一个带有“通过兴趣的活力”的三因素模型最适合样本1,而一个带有“通过时间的活力”的替代三因素模型最适合样本2。一个包含两种活力形式的四因素模型并未在最佳拟合的三因素模型上有所改进。结果支持了带有二阶因素的三因素结构的普遍性,但表明活力有两种不同的变体。讨论了与老年人主观幸福感相关的跨文化以及其他影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验