Bigu J
Elliot Lake Laboratory, Ontario, Canada.
Health Phys. 1991 Dec;61(6):763-73. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199112000-00007.
Radon-222 flux density, J, has been determined in a number of locations in an underground U mine. Measurements were conducted using the Two-Point Measurement (2PM) method, consisting of measuring the 222Rn concentration at two different points a distance apart within a given section of the mine. Several mine models were used for determining J by the above method. The 2PM method is sensitive to sources and sinks of 222Rn other than mine walls, as well as mining operations and mining activities of a diverse nature, and to local variations in airflow conditions. Because of this, J obtained by the 2PM method represents an "apparent" flux density. Significant differences were found in the flux density calculated according to different mine models. In addition, J measurements using the flux "can" method were also carried out in mine walls and compared with the values obtained by the 2PM method. Wide discrepancies between the two methods were found. The practical and theoretical difficulties in determining J are discussed.
已在一座地下铀矿的多个位置测定了氡 - 222通量密度J。测量采用两点测量法(2PM)进行,该方法包括在矿井给定区域内相距一定距离的两个不同点测量222Rn浓度。使用了几种矿井模型通过上述方法确定J。2PM方法对除矿井壁之外的222Rn源和汇、以及各种采矿作业和采矿活动以及气流条件的局部变化敏感。因此,通过2PM方法获得的J代表“表观”通量密度。根据不同矿井模型计算出的通量密度存在显著差异。此外,还在矿井壁中采用通量“罐”法进行了J测量,并与2PM方法获得的值进行了比较。发现两种方法之间存在很大差异。讨论了确定J时的实际和理论困难。