Suppr超能文献

20小时静脉注射与72小时口服乙酰半胱氨酸方案治疗急性对乙酰氨基酚中毒的比较。

Comparison of the 20-hour intravenous and 72-hour oral acetylcysteine protocols for the treatment of acute acetaminophen poisoning.

作者信息

Yarema Mark C, Johnson David W, Berlin Randall J, Sivilotti Marco L A, Nettel-Aguirre Alberto, Brant Rollin F, Spyker Daniel A, Bailey Benoit, Chalut Dominic, Lee Jacques S, Plint Amy C, Purssell Roy A, Rutledge Tim, Seviour Catherine A, Stiell Ian G, Thompson Margaret, Tyberg Jeffrey, Dart Richard C, Rumack Barry H

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine and Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;54(4):606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after acute acetaminophen poisoning in 2 large cohorts of patients treated with either the 20-hour intravenous or 72-hour oral acetylcysteine protocol.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with historical control comparing patients treated with one of 2 acetylcysteine regimens. Data for the 20-hour group were obtained from a medical record review of patients on whom the 20-hour intravenous protocol was initiated in Canadian hospitals from 1980 to 2005. The 72-hour group consisted of a historical cohort of patients treated in US hospitals with the 72-hour oral protocol from 1976 to 1985. The primary outcome was hepatotoxicity (aminotransferase levels >1,000 IU/L).

RESULTS

Of the 4,048 patients analyzed, 2,086 were in the 20-hour group and 1,962 were in the 72-hour group. The incidence of hepatotoxicity was 13.9% in the 20-hour group and 15.8% in the 72-hour group (-1.9% absolute difference; 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.2 to 0.3). The relative risk of hepatotoxicity was lower in the 20-hour group when acetylcysteine was initiated within 12 hours of ingestion. The relative risk was lower in the 72-hour group when acetylcysteine was initiated later than 18 hours after ingestion. There was no significant risk difference between groups when acetylcysteine treatment was started 12 to 18 hours after ingestion. One patient in the 20-hour group received a liver transplant and died because of acetaminophen toxicity compared with no liver transplants and 3 deaths in the 72-hour group. Anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous acetylcysteine were reported in 148 of 2,086 patients (7.1%; 95% CI 6.1% to 8.3%). This study is limited by comparison of 2 separate data sets from different countries and study years.

CONCLUSION

The risk of hepatotoxicity differed between the 20-hour and 72-hour protocols according to the time to initiation of acetylcysteine. It favored the 20-hour protocol for patients presenting early and favored the 72-hour protocol for patients presenting late after acute acetaminophen overdose.

摘要

研究目的

比较两组大型急性对乙酰氨基酚中毒患者分别接受20小时静脉注射或72小时口服乙酰半胱氨酸方案治疗后的结果。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,采用历史对照,比较接受两种乙酰半胱氨酸治疗方案之一的患者。20小时组的数据来自对1980年至2005年在加拿大医院开始接受20小时静脉注射方案治疗的患者的病历回顾。72小时组由1976年至1985年在美国医院接受72小时口服方案治疗的历史队列患者组成。主要结局是肝毒性(转氨酶水平>1000 IU/L)。

结果

在分析的4048例患者中,2086例在20小时组,1962例在72小时组。20小时组肝毒性发生率为13.9%,72小时组为15.8%(绝对差异-1.9%;95%置信区间[CI]-4.2至0.3)。当在摄入后12小时内开始使用乙酰半胱氨酸时,20小时组肝毒性的相对风险较低。当在摄入后18小时后开始使用乙酰半胱氨酸时,72小时组的相对风险较低。当在摄入后12至18小时开始乙酰半胱氨酸治疗时,两组之间没有显著的风险差异。20小时组有1例患者接受了肝移植并因对乙酰氨基酚毒性死亡,而72小时组没有肝移植患者,有3例死亡。2086例患者中有148例(7.1%;95%CI 6.1%至8.3%)报告了对静脉注射乙酰半胱氨酸的类过敏反应。本研究受到来自不同国家和研究年份的两个独立数据集比较的限制。

结论

根据开始使用乙酰半胱氨酸的时间,20小时和72小时方案的肝毒性风险不同。对于急性对乙酰氨基酚过量后早期就诊的患者,20小时方案更有利;对于晚期就诊的患者,72小时方案更有利。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验