Marks Daniel J B, Dargan Paul I, Archer John R H, Davies Charlotte L, Dines Alison M, Wood David M, Greene Shaun L
Department of Clinical Toxicology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;83(6):1263-1272. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13214. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
This article is commented on by Bateman DN and Dear JW. Should we treat very large paracetamol overdose differently? Br J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 83: 1163-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13279 AIMS: Treatment of paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose with acetylcysteine is standardized, with dose determined only by patient weight. The validity of this approach for massive overdoses has been questioned. We systematically compared outcomes in massive and non-massive overdoses, to guide whether alternative treatment strategies should be considered, and whether the ratio between measured timed paracetamol concentrations (APAP ) and treatment nomogram thresholds at those time points (APAP ) provides a useful assessment tool.
This is a retrospective observational study of all patients (n = 545) between 2005 and 2013 admitted to a tertiary care toxicology service with acute non-staggered paracetamol overdose. Massive overdoses were defined as extrapolated 4-h plasma paracetamol concentrations >250 mg l , or reported ingestions ≥30 g. Outcomes (liver injury, coagulopathy and kidney injury) were assessed in relation to reported dose and APAP :APAP ratio (based on a treatment line through 100 mg l at 4 h), and time to acetylcysteine.
Ingestions of ≥30 g paracetamol correlated with higher peak serum aminotransferase (r = 0.212, P < 0.0001) and creatinine (r = 0.138, P = 0.002) concentrations. Acute liver injury, hepatotoxicity and coagulopathy were more frequent with APAP :APAP ≥ 3 with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 9.19 (5.04-16.68), 35.95 (8.80-158.1) and 8.34 (4.43-15.84), respectively (P < 0.0001). Heightened risk persisted in patients receiving acetylcysteine within 8 h of overdose.
Patients presenting following massive paracetamol overdose are at higher risk of organ injury, even when acetylcysteine is administered early. Enhanced therapeutic strategies should be considered in those who have an APAP :APAP ≥ 3. Novel biomarkers of incipient liver injury and abbreviated acetylcysteine regimens require validation in this patient cohort.
本文受到贝特曼·DN和迪尔·JW的评论。我们是否应该以不同方式治疗超大剂量对乙酰氨基酚过量?《英国临床药理学杂志》2017年;83: 1163 - 1165。https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13279 目的:用乙酰半胱氨酸治疗对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)过量是标准化的,剂量仅由患者体重决定。这种方法对超大剂量过量的有效性受到质疑。我们系统地比较了超大剂量和非超大剂量过量的结果,以指导是否应考虑替代治疗策略,以及所测对乙酰氨基酚浓度随时间变化值(APAP)与这些时间点治疗图谱阈值(APAP)之间的比值是否提供了一种有用的评估工具。
这是一项对2005年至2013年期间因急性非交错性对乙酰氨基酚过量入住三级医疗毒理学服务机构的所有患者(n = 545)的回顾性观察研究。超大剂量过量定义为推算的4小时血浆对乙酰氨基酚浓度>250 mg/l,或报告的摄入量≥30 g。根据报告的剂量和APAP:APAP比值(基于4小时时100 mg/l的治疗线)以及给予乙酰半胱氨酸的时间,评估结果(肝损伤、凝血障碍和肾损伤)。
对乙酰氨基酚摄入量≥30 g与较高的血清转氨酶峰值(r = 0.212,P < 0.0001)和肌酐(r = 0.138,P = 0.002)浓度相关。当APAP:APAP≥3时,急性肝损伤、肝毒性和凝血障碍更常见,优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)分别为9.19(5.04 - 16.68)、35.95(8.80 - 158.1)和8.34(4.43 - 15.84)(P < 0.0001)。在过量后8小时内接受乙酰半胱氨酸治疗的患者中,风险仍然较高。
超大剂量对乙酰氨基酚过量后的患者即使早期给予乙酰半胱氨酸,发生器官损伤的风险也更高。对于APAP:APAP≥3的患者,应考虑强化治疗策略。早期肝损伤的新型生物标志物和简化的乙酰半胱氨酸治疗方案需要在该患者队列中进行验证。