Frederiksen Heidi Bøgelund, Kragstrup Jakob, Dehlholm-Lambertsen Gitte
Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Jun 26;10:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-47.
Continuity of care has traditionally been regarded as a core quality of general practice, but the long-term doctor-patient relationship has been put under pressure. In many places practices are expanding, with larger teams and more registered patients, thereby threatening the possibility of patients staying with their own general practitioner (GP). GPs often take it for granted that interpersonal continuity is valuable. However, little is known about how patient satisfaction is related to interpersonal continuity. The purpose of this study is to explore the creation of patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction in the interpersonal relation with the GP, and in a comprehensive way to investigate how this is related to continuity of care.
Qualitative study based on 22 interviews with patients from two practices in Denmark. A total of 12 patients saw a regular doctor and 10 saw an unfamiliar doctor. The patients were selected after an observed consultation and sampled purposefully according to reason for encounter, age and sex. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to study how patients perceive meeting either a regular or an unfamiliar GP. The analysis explored the patients' perception of their interpersonal relationship with their GP, and interpreted the accounts by using social psychological theories.
A long-term continuous relationship with the GP could be satisfactory, but it could also be the reverse. The same pattern was shown in case of an unfamiliar GP. Therefore, patient satisfaction and interpersonal continuity were not causally related. On the contrary, there was a general pattern of how the satisfactory and trustful doctor-patient relationship from the patients' point of view could be created, maintained or destroyed. A pattern where the process of recognition, by respecting and remembering, on the one hand created and maintained satisfaction while humiliation on the other hand destroyed satisfaction in the relationship.
It was not valuable to have a continuous relationship unless the GP recognized the patient. The social psychological concept of recognition had two different meanings and the GP had to do both, respect and remember the patient, in order to create and sustain the trustful relationship. The added value of interpersonal continuity had to be combined with recognition.
长期以来,连续性医疗一直被视为全科医疗的核心质量,但长期的医患关系面临压力。在许多地方,医疗机构规模不断扩大,团队规模更大,注册患者更多,这对患者一直由自己的全科医生(GP)诊疗的可能性构成了威胁。全科医生往往认为人际连续性是有价值的。然而,对于患者满意度与人际连续性之间的关系却知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨在与全科医生的人际关系中患者满意度或不满的产生情况,并全面调查其与连续性医疗的关系。
基于对丹麦两家医疗机构的22名患者进行访谈的定性研究。共有12名患者看的是固定医生,10名患者看的是不熟悉的医生。患者是在观察到一次诊疗后被选中的,并根据就诊原因、年龄和性别进行有目的的抽样。采用解释现象学分析(IPA)来研究患者如何看待与固定或不熟悉的全科医生的会面。该分析探讨了患者对其与全科医生人际关系的看法,并运用社会心理学理论对这些描述进行解读。
与全科医生的长期持续关系可能令人满意,但也可能相反。与不熟悉的全科医生接触时也呈现出相同模式。因此,患者满意度与人际连续性并无因果关系。相反,从患者角度来看,存在一种关于如何建立、维持或破坏令人满意且信任的医患关系的普遍模式。一种模式是,通过尊重和记住患者的认可过程一方面创造并维持了满意度,而另一方面羞辱则破坏了关系中的满意度。
除非全科医生认可患者,否则持续关系并无价值。认可这一社会心理学概念有两种不同含义,全科医生必须兼顾两者,既要尊重又要记住患者,才能建立并维持信任关系。人际连续性的附加价值必须与认可相结合。