• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压自我管理干预对糖尿病和胆固醇控制的影响。

The effect of a hypertension self-management intervention on diabetes and cholesterol control.

作者信息

Powers Benjamin J, Olsen Maren K, Oddone Eugene Z, Bosworth Hayden B

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2009 Jul;122(7):639-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.022
PMID:19559166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3766525/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patient chronic disease self-management interventions target single-disease outcomes. We evaluated the effect of a tailored hypertension self-management intervention on the unintended targets of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).

METHODS

We evaluated patients from the Veterans Study to Improve the Control of Hypertension, a 2-year randomized controlled trial. Patients received either a hypertension self-management intervention delivered by a nurse over the telephone or usual care. Although the study focused on hypertension self-management, we compared changes in HbA1c among a subgroup of 216 patients with diabetes and LDL-C among 528 patients with measurements during the study period. Changes in these laboratory values over time were compared between the 2 treatment groups using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

For the patients with diabetes, the hypertension self-management intervention resulted in a 0.46% reduction in HbA1c over 2 years compared with usual care (95% confidence interval, 0.04%-0.89%; P = .03). For LDL-C, there was a minimal 0.9 mg/dL between-group difference that was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, -7.3-5.6 mg/dL; P = .79).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant effect of the self-management intervention on the unintended target of HbA1c, but not LDL-C. Chronic disease self-management interventions might have "spill-over" effects on patients' comorbid chronic conditions.

摘要

背景

大多数患者慢性病自我管理干预措施针对单一疾病结局。我们评估了一种量身定制的高血压自我管理干预措施对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)这些非预期目标的影响。

方法

我们对退伍军人高血压控制改善研究中的患者进行了评估,这是一项为期2年的随机对照试验。患者要么接受护士通过电话提供的高血压自我管理干预,要么接受常规护理。尽管该研究侧重于高血压自我管理,但我们比较了216例糖尿病患者亚组中HbA1c的变化以及528例在研究期间有测量值的患者中LDL-C的变化。使用线性混合效应模型比较了两个治疗组之间这些实验室值随时间的变化。

结果

对于糖尿病患者,与常规护理相比,高血压自我管理干预在2年内使HbA1c降低了0.46%(95%置信区间,0.04% - 0.89%;P = 0.03)。对于LDL-C,组间差异极小,为0.9mg/dL,无统计学意义(95%置信区间,-7.3 - 5.6mg/dL;P = 0.79)。

结论

自我管理干预对HbA1c这一非预期目标有显著影响,但对LDL-C没有影响。慢性病自我管理干预措施可能对患者的合并慢性病有“溢出”效应。

相似文献

1
The effect of a hypertension self-management intervention on diabetes and cholesterol control.高血压自我管理干预对糖尿病和胆固醇控制的影响。
Am J Med. 2009 Jul;122(7):639-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.022.
2
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
3
The Cholesterol, Hypertension, And Glucose Education (CHANGE) study: results from a randomized controlled trial in African Americans with diabetes.胆固醇、高血压和葡萄糖教育(CHANGE)研究:一项针对糖尿病非裔美国人的随机对照试验结果。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jul;166(1):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 17.
4
The Informatics for Diabetes and Education Telemedicine (IDEATel) project.糖尿病与教育远程医疗信息学(IDEATel)项目。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2007;118:289-304.
5
Effects of Mobile Text Messaging on Glycemic Control in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.移动短信对冠心病合并糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep;12(9):e005805. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005805. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 year results of the IDEATel study.一项针对老年、种族多样、医疗服务不足的糖尿病患者,比较远程医疗病例管理与常规护理的随机试验:IDEATel研究的5年结果
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):446-56. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3157. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
7
A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus.一项针对年龄较大、种族多样、医疗服务不足的糖尿病患者,比较远程医疗病例管理与常规护理的随机试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):40-51. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1917. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
8
Evaluation of an mHealth-enabled hierarchical diabetes management intervention in primary care in China (ROADMAP): A cluster randomized trial.评估移动医疗支持的中国基层医疗中分级糖尿病管理干预(ROADMAP):一项群组随机试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 21;18(9):e1003754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003754. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Practical Telemedicine for Veterans with Persistently Poor Diabetes Control: A Randomized Pilot Trial.针对糖尿病控制持续不佳退伍军人的实用远程医疗:一项随机试点试验。
Telemed J E Health. 2016 May;22(5):376-84. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0145. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
10
Maintenance of Clinical Endpoints After Discharge from a Pharmacist-Managed Risk Reduction Clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.退伍军人事务医疗中心药剂师管理的风险降低诊所出院后临床终点的维持情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):14-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Effectiveness of Digital Health Behavior Strategies on Type 2 Diabetes Management: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.评估数字健康行为策略对2型糖尿病管理的有效性:系统评价与网络荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 14;27:e63209. doi: 10.2196/63209.
2
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
3
Trends in quality of care among children with sickle cell anemia.镰状细胞贫血患儿的护理质量趋势。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Feb;69(2):e29446. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29446. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
4
"I am getting something out of this, so I am going to stick with it": supporting participants' home practice in Mindfulness-Based Programmes.“我从中有所收获,所以我会坚持下去”:支持正念课程计划参与者的家庭实践。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;8(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00453-x.
5
Are formal self-care interventions for healthy people effective? A systematic review of the evidence.针对健康人群的正规自我护理干预措施是否有效?证据的系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Nov 6;4(Suppl 10):e001415. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001415. eCollection 2019.
6
Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of cardiovascular risk factors among patients with hypertension in South African primary care.南非初级保健中高血压患者心血管危险因素的患病率及其社会人口学相关因素
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018 Nov/Dec;29(6):344-351. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2018-038.
7
The empirical evidence for the telemedicine intervention in diabetes management.远程医疗干预在糖尿病管理中的实证证据。
Telemed J E Health. 2015 May;21(5):321-54. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0029. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Behavior matters: the relevance, impact, and reach of behavioral medicine.行为至关重要:行为医学的相关性、影响及范围。
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Feb;49(1):40-8. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9672-1.
9
Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review.基于团队的护理与改善血压控制:社区指南系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jul;47(1):86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
10
Effect of home telemonitoring on glycemic and blood pressure control in primary care clinic patients with diabetes.家庭远程监测对基层医疗诊所糖尿病患者血糖和血压控制的影响。
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Mar;20(3):199-205. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0151. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived and actual stroke risk among men with hypertension.高血压男性的感知和实际中风风险。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Apr;10(4):287-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07797.x.
2
Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes.多因素干预对2型糖尿病患者死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 7;358(6):580-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706245.
3
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.《2008年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会统计委员会及中风统计小组委员会报告》
Circulation. 2008 Jan 29;117(4):e25-146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
4
Meta-analysis: the effect of dietary counseling for weight loss.荟萃分析:饮食咨询对减肥的影响
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 3;147(1):41-50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00007.
5
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.用于冠心病一级预防的多重危险因素干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD001561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001561.pub2.
6
Simultaneous control of intermediate diabetes outcomes among Veterans Affairs primary care patients.美国退伍军人事务部初级保健患者中间糖尿病结局的同步控制
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Oct;21(10):1050-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00519.x.
7
Therapeutic goal attainment in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia.高血压和血脂异常患者治疗目标的达成情况。
Med Care. 2006 Jan;44(1):39-46. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000188982.25397.37.
8
Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults.荟萃分析:针对老年人的慢性病自我管理项目
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 20;143(6):427-38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00007.
9
Patients' perceived barriers to active self-management of chronic conditions.患者对慢性病主动自我管理的认知障碍。
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.004.
10
The veterans' study to improve the control of hypertension (V-STITCH): design and methodology.退伍军人高血压控制改善研究(V-STITCH):设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Apr;26(2):155-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.12.006.