Lamas Adelaida, López-Herce Jesús, Sancho Luis, Mencía Santiago, Carrillo Angel, Santiago Maria José, Martínez Vicente
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.074.
There is no reference method for the evaluation of the level of sedation in children after cardiac surgery. The utility of the bispectral index and middle latency auditory evoked potentials has not been evaluated.
The bispectral index, middle latency auditory evoked potentials, Ramsay scale, and COMFORT scale were used for assessment of the level of sedation in critically ill children after cardiac surgery and other surgical procedures. The measurements with these four methods were recorded simultaneously once a day for five days. The level of sedation was categorized in two levels, moderate or deep, according to the values obtained from each method. Correlations and agreements among the methods and the best bispectral index and middle latency auditory evoked potential values that discriminated between the two levels of sedation were calculated.
Thirty-two children after cardiac surgery were included in the study, together with eighteen children after other surgical procedures who formed the control group. In each group, the correlation and agreement between the four methods varied between moderate and good. In the cardiac surgery patients, when the level of sedation was determined by the Ramsay scale, the best values of bispectral index and middle latency auditory evoked potentials that discriminated between the two levels of sedation were 63.5 and 37.5, respectively, and these values predicted the level of sedation correctly in 84.4% of the patients with each method.
Bispectral index and middle latency auditory evoked potentials could be useful to assess the level of sedation in children after cardiac surgery.
目前尚无评估儿童心脏手术后镇静水平的参考方法。脑电双频指数(Bispectral index,BIS)和中潜伏期听觉诱发电位(middle latency auditory evoked potentials,MLAEP)的效用尚未得到评估。
采用脑电双频指数、中潜伏期听觉诱发电位、Ramsay评分量表和COMFORT评分量表对心脏手术后及其他外科手术后的危重症儿童的镇静水平进行评估。这四种方法的测量结果每天同时记录一次,共记录五天。根据每种方法获得的值,将镇静水平分为中度或深度两个级别。计算各方法之间的相关性和一致性,以及区分两个镇静水平的最佳脑电双频指数和中潜伏期听觉诱发电位值。
本研究纳入了32例心脏手术后的儿童,另有18例其他外科手术后的儿童作为对照组。在每组中,四种方法之间的相关性和一致性从中度到良好不等。在心脏手术患者中,当用Ramsay评分量表确定镇静水平时,区分两个镇静水平的最佳脑电双频指数和中潜伏期听觉诱发电位值分别为63.5和37.5,并且每种方法在84.4%的患者中正确预测了镇静水平。
脑电双频指数和中潜伏期听觉诱发电位可用于评估儿童心脏手术后的镇静水平。