Suppr超能文献

通过脑电双频指数、听觉诱发电位和临床量表评估危重症儿童的镇静状态。

Assessing sedation in critically ill children by bispectral index, auditory-evoked potentials and clinical scales.

作者信息

Lamas Adelaida, López-Herce Jesús, Sancho Luis, Mencía Santiago, Carrillo Angel, Santiago Maria José, Martínez Vicente

机构信息

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2008 Nov;34(11):2092-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1198-1. Epub 2008 Jul 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlation and agreement between the bispectral index (BIS), middle latency auditory-evoked potential index (AEP index), Ramsay scale (RS) and COMFORT scale (CS) for evaluation of the level of sedation in critically ill children.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Pediatric critical care unit.

PATIENTS

Seventy-seven critically ill children receiving sedation and mechanical ventilation.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Simultaneous recording of BIS, AEP index, RS and CS were performed once a day, for a maximum of 5 days. Two levels of sedation were categorized: light-moderate versus deep-very deep. Correlations between methods were determined using Spearman rank correlation test and the agreement using Cohen's Kappa test. The correlation and agreement between the four methods was moderate-to-good. Correlation was not found in paralyzed children. There was no correlation between the four methods and the heart rate or blood pressure, or with the type or dose of sedative medication. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed best discrimination between light-moderate and deep-very deep sedation at BIS and AEP index values of 63.5 and 33.5 when the level of sedation was classified by the RS, and at BIS and AEP index values of 67 and 37.5, respectively, when the level of sedation was classified by the CS.

CONCLUSION

There is a moderate-to-good correlation and agreement of BIS and AEP index with the clinical scales in critically ill children without neuromuscular blockade. BIS and AEP index could be useful to evaluate the level of sedation in critically ill children with and without neuromuscular blockade.

摘要

目的

评估脑电双频指数(BIS)、中潜伏期听觉诱发电位指数(AEP指数)、拉姆齐评分(RS)和舒适评分(CS)在评估危重症儿童镇静水平方面的相关性和一致性。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

儿科重症监护病房。

患者

77例接受镇静和机械通气的危重症儿童。

测量与结果

每天同时记录一次BIS、AEP指数、RS和CS,最多记录5天。将镇静水平分为两级:轻-中度与深-极深度。采用Spearman等级相关检验确定各方法之间的相关性,采用Cohen's Kappa检验确定一致性。四种方法之间的相关性和一致性为中度至良好。在瘫痪儿童中未发现相关性。四种方法与心率、血压或镇静药物的类型或剂量之间均无相关性。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示,当根据RS对镇静水平进行分类时,BIS和AEP指数值分别为63.5和33.5时,对轻-中度和深-极深度镇静的区分最佳;当根据CS对镇静水平进行分类时,BIS和AEP指数值分别为67和37.5时,区分最佳。

结论

在无神经肌肉阻滞的危重症儿童中,BIS和AEP指数与临床量表之间存在中度至良好的相关性和一致性。BIS和AEP指数可用于评估有无神经肌肉阻滞的危重症儿童的镇静水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验