Seder Christopher W, Hanna Kenny, Lucia Victoria, Boura Judith, Kim Sang W, Welsh Robert J, Chmielewski Gary W
Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):216-25; discussion 225-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.017.
We hypothesized that established thoracic surgeons without formal minimally invasive training can learn thoracoscopic lobectomy without compromising patient safety or outcome.
Data were retrospectively collected on patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy at a single health system between August 1, 2003, and April 1, 2008. Age, sex, pulmonary function tests, preoperative and postoperative stages, pathologic diagnosis, anatomic resection, extent of lymph node sampling, surgical technique and duration, complications, blood loss, transfusion requirement, chest tube duration, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, and mortality rate were examined. The percentage of patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy and their outcomes were then compared among three chronologic cohorts.
Three hundred sixty-four patients underwent pulmonary lobectomy (239 open; 99 thoracoscopic; 26 thoracoscopic converted to open). Baseline characteristics, staging, pathologic diagnosis, and anatomic resections were similar in the early, middle, and late cohorts. The percentage of thoracoscopic lobectomies increased from 16% to 49%, whereas open lobectomy decreased from 81% to 42% (p < 0.0001). The complication rate remained constant with the exception of air leaks lasting more than 7 days (9% versus 10% versus 2%; p = 0.02). Hospital length of stay (6 versus 5 versus 4 days; p < 0.0001) and chest tube duration (4 versus 3 versus 3 days; p < 0.0001) decreased and operative duration increased as more thoracoscopic lobectomies were performed. Blood loss, transfusion requirement, 30-day readmission, and 1-year survival were not significantly different among chronologic cohorts.
Established thoracic surgeons can safely incorporate thoracoscopic lobectomy with no increase in morbidity or mortality.
我们假设,未接受过正规微创培训的资深胸外科医生能够学会胸腔镜肺叶切除术,且不影响患者安全或手术效果。
回顾性收集2003年8月1日至2008年4月1日期间在单一医疗系统接受肺叶切除术患者的数据。考察患者的年龄、性别、肺功能测试、术前和术后分期、病理诊断、解剖性切除、淋巴结采样范围、手术技术及持续时间、并发症、失血量、输血需求、胸管留置时间、住院时间、30天再入院率及死亡率。然后比较三个时间队列中接受胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者的百分比及其手术效果。
364例患者接受了肺叶切除术(239例开胸手术;99例胸腔镜手术;26例由胸腔镜手术转为开胸手术)。早期、中期和晚期队列中的基线特征、分期、病理诊断及解剖性切除情况相似。胸腔镜肺叶切除术的百分比从16%增至49%,而开胸肺叶切除术从81%降至42%(p < 0.0001)。除漏气持续超过7天外,并发症发生率保持不变(9%对10%对2%;p = 0.02)。随着胸腔镜肺叶切除术实施例数增多,住院时间(6天对5天对4天;p < 0.0001)和胸管留置时间(4天对3天对3天;p < 0.0001)缩短,手术持续时间延长。各时间队列间失血量、输血需求、30天再入院率及1年生存率无显著差异。
资深胸外科医生能够安全地开展胸腔镜肺叶切除术,且发病率和死亡率不会增加。