Kauffman James M, Hung Li-Yu
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;22(5):452-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832eb5c3.
To inform readers of current issues in special education for individuals with intellectual disabilities and summarize recent research and opinion.
Two issues dominate special education for students with intellectual disabilities in the early 21st century. First, what should be taught to such students and who should teach them? Second, where should such students be taught - in 'inclusive' settings alongside normal peers or in special settings dedicated to their special needs? Research on teaching reading, arithmetic, and functional daily living skills to students with disabilities suggests the superiority of direct, systematic instruction. Universal design is often seen as supportive of inclusion. Inclusion has been seen as the central issue in special education but is gradually giving way to concern for what students learn.
Direct, systematic instruction in reading, arithmetic, and daily living skills is the most effective approach to teaching students with intellectual disabilities. Basic concepts and logic suggest that special and general education cannot be equivalent. We conclude that what students are taught should be put ahead of where they are taught. Our fundamental concern is that students with intellectual disabilities be respected and be taught all they can learn.
向读者介绍智力残疾个体特殊教育的当前问题,并总结近期研究和观点。
21世纪初,智力残疾学生的特殊教育主要有两个问题。第一,应该教这些学生什么,由谁来教他们?第二,这些学生应该在哪里接受教育——是与正常同龄人一起在“融合”环境中,还是在满足其特殊需求的特殊环境中?针对残疾学生阅读、算术和功能性日常生活技能教学的研究表明,直接、系统的教学更具优势。通用设计通常被视为支持融合教育。融合教育一直被视为特殊教育的核心问题,但逐渐让位于对学生所学内容的关注。
对智力残疾学生进行直接、系统的阅读、算术和生活技能教学是最有效的方法。基本概念和逻辑表明,特殊教育和普通教育不可能等同。我们得出结论,学生所学内容应优先于学习地点。我们最根本的关注点是,智力残疾学生应受到尊重,并被传授他们所能学到的一切。