Lagarde Emmanuel, Taljaard Dirk, Puren Adrian, Auvert Bertran
INSERM U687, IFR69, Villejuif, France.
S Afr Med J. 2009 Mar;99(3):163-9.
The Tara KLamp (TK) device has been claimed to enable circumcisions to be performed safely and easily in medical and non-medical environments. Published evaluation studies have been conducted among young children only.
Following a randomised controlled trial (RCT) on 3 274 participants on the impact of male circumcision on HIV transmission, 69 control group members participated in this male circumcision methods trial and were randomised to a forceps-guided (FG) group and a TK group, and circumcised.
Of the 166 men asked to participate, 97 declined, most (94) refusing circumcision by the TK technique; 34 men were randomised to the FG group and 35 to the TK group, and 32 and 24 patients were circumcised by the FG and TK methods respectively, of whom 29 and 19 respectively attended the post-circumcision visit. All 12 adverse event sheets corresponded to the TK group (p<0.001) and circumcisions by the TK method. Less favourable outcomes were associated with the TK method, including any sign of an adverse event (37% v. 3%; p=0.004), delayed wound healing (21% v. 3%; p=0.004) and problems with penis appearance (31% v. 3%; p=0.001). Participants randomised to the TK method were significantly more likely to report bleeding (21% v. 0%; p=0.02), injury to the penis (21% v. 0%; p=0.02), infection (32% v. 0%; p=0.002), swelling (83%/ v. 0%; p<0.001), and problems with urinating (16% v. 0%; p=0.056). The mean score of self-estimated pain was 9.5 for participants circumcised by TK compared with 6.1 for other participants (adjusted p=0.003).
This study provides compelling evidence that strongly cautions against use of the TK method on young adults.
Tara KLamp(TK)设备据称能使包皮环切术在医疗和非医疗环境中安全、轻松地进行。已发表的评估研究仅在幼儿中开展。
在一项针对3274名参与者的关于男性包皮环切术对HIV传播影响的随机对照试验(RCT)之后,69名对照组成员参与了这项男性包皮环切术方法试验,并被随机分为钳夹引导(FG)组和TK组,然后进行包皮环切术。
在被邀请参与的166名男性中,97人拒绝,其中大多数(94人)拒绝采用TK技术进行包皮环切术;34名男性被随机分配到FG组,35名被分配到TK组,分别有32名和24名患者通过FG和TK方法进行了包皮环切术,其中分别有29名和19名患者接受了包皮环切术后随访。所有12份不良事件报告均对应TK组(p<0.001)以及采用TK方法进行的包皮环切术。TK方法的结果较差,包括任何不良事件迹象(37%对3%;p=0.004)、伤口愈合延迟(21%对3%;p=0.004)以及阴茎外观问题(31%对3%;p=0.001)。被随机分配到TK方法组的参与者更有可能报告出血(21%对0%;p=0.02)、阴茎损伤(21%对0%;p=0.02)、感染(32%对0%;p=0.002)、肿胀(83%对0%;p<0.001)以及排尿问题(16%对0%;p=0.056)。采用TK方法进行包皮环切术的参与者自我估计疼痛的平均评分是9.5,而其他参与者为6.1(校正p=0.003)。
本研究提供了有力证据,强烈告诫不要在年轻成年人中使用TK方法。