Nicolaï Saskia P A, Kruidenier Lotte M, Rouwet Ellen V, Graffius Kirsten, Prins Martin H, Teijink Joep A W
Department of Surgery, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul;50(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.073.
Assessment of walking distance by treadmill testing is the most commonly used method to evaluate the effect of treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease. However, treadmill testing is time consuming, relatively expensive, and does not adequately reflect real life functional ability. We hypothesized that the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) could be an alternative tool to assess objective improvement in functional walking ability of patients with intermittent claudication.
This was a validation study. It was conducted through the outpatient clinic for vascular surgery. Patients with intermittent claudication were referred for supervised exercise therapy. Treadmill testing (absolute claudication distance [ACD]), WIQ, and quality of life questionnaires (RAND-36 and EuroQol) were administered at study onset and after 3 months of supervised exercise therapy. Responsiveness was determined by mean changes in and correlation coefficients of WIQ, ACD, and quality of life questionnaires. Patients were categorized into quartiles based on the increase in ACD, which were subsequently related to change in WIQ and quality of life.
The mean pre- and post-treatment total WIQ scores of 91 patients were 0.45 (0.22) and 0.58 (0.22), respectively. The correlation coefficient between the change in total WIQ score and ACD was 0.331 (P = .004). A 0.1 change in total WIQ score corresponded to a change of 345 meters in ACD. Analysis of the four quartiles compared to an increase in ACD showed that a greater increase in ACD corresponded with a greater increase in WIQ score, from 0.06 to 0.25 (P = .011).
These data indicate that the WIQ is a valid tool to detect improvement or deterioration in the daily walking ability of patients with intermittent claudication. Hence, the WIQ can be used as an alternative to treadmill testing for objective assessment of functional walking ability, both in daily practice and in clinical trials.
通过跑步机测试评估步行距离是评估外周动脉疾病患者治疗效果最常用的方法。然而,跑步机测试耗时、相对昂贵,且不能充分反映实际生活中的功能能力。我们推测,步行障碍问卷(WIQ)可能是评估间歇性跛行患者功能性步行能力客观改善情况的一种替代工具。
这是一项验证性研究。通过血管外科门诊进行。将间歇性跛行患者转诊接受监督运动治疗。在研究开始时以及监督运动治疗3个月后,进行跑步机测试(绝对跛行距离[ACD])、WIQ和生活质量问卷(RAND - 36和欧洲五维度健康量表)。通过WIQ、ACD和生活质量问卷的平均变化及相关系数来确定反应性。根据ACD的增加情况将患者分为四分位数,随后将其与WIQ和生活质量的变化相关联。
91例患者治疗前和治疗后WIQ总评分的平均值分别为0.45(0.22)和0.58(0.22)。WIQ总评分变化与ACD之间的相关系数为0.331(P = 0.004)。WIQ总评分0.1的变化对应ACD变化345米。与ACD增加情况相比,对四个四分位数的分析表明,ACD增加越多,WIQ评分增加越大,从0.06增加到0.25(P = 0.011)。
这些数据表明,WIQ是检测间歇性跛行患者日常步行能力改善或恶化的有效工具。因此,在日常实践和临床试验中,WIQ可作为跑步机测试的替代方法,用于客观评估功能性步行能力。