• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of learner-centered teaching on motivation and learning strategies in a third-year pharmacotherapy course.以学习者为中心的教学对三年级药物治疗课程中学习动机和学习策略的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 May 27;73(3):42. doi: 10.5688/aj730342.
2
Measuring medical students' reflection on their learning: modification and validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ).测量医学生对学习的反思:学习动机策略问卷(MSLQ)的修订与验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 22;18(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1384-y.
3
Design and evaluation of a two-phase learner-centered new student orientation program.以学习者为中心的两阶段新生入学指导计划的设计与评估
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Apr;10(4):486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
4
Evaluating student perceptions of a learner-centered drug literature evaluation course.评估学生对以学习者为中心的药物文献评估课程的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Dec 15;72(6):135. doi: 10.5688/aj7206135.
5
Does changing from a teacher-centered to a learner-centered context promote self-regulated learning: a qualitative study in a Japanese undergraduate setting.从以教师为中心转变为以学习者为中心的环境是否能促进自主学习:日本本科环境下的一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 17;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1550-x.
6
Are fishbowl activities effective for teaching pharmacotherapy and developing postformal thought in pharmacy students? A pilot study.鱼缸活动对药学专业学生的药物治疗教学和后形式思维培养有效吗?一项试点研究。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Aug;10(8):1070-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
Thinking Clinically from the Beginning: Early Introduction of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.从一开始就进行临床思维:药剂师患者护理流程的早期引入。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Dec 25;80(10):164. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8010164.
8
An active-learning course model to teach pharmacotherapy in geriatrics.一个主动学习课程模式,用于教授老年病患者的药物治疗学。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Apr 12;74(3):38. doi: 10.5688/aj740338.
9
Do Chosen Learning Strategies Predict Academic Performance in First-Year DPT Anatomy Students?选择学习策略是否能预测第一年物理治疗专业解剖学学生的学业表现?
J Phys Ther Educ. 2024 Jun 1;38(2):100-106. doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000320. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
10
A motivational interviewing course for pharmacy students.面向药学专业学生的动机性访谈课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 May 12;74(4):70. doi: 10.5688/aj740470.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral Health Educational Intervention for Primary Healthcare Providers Using the Flipped Approach.采用翻转课堂教学法对基层医疗服务提供者进行口腔健康教育干预
Front Dent. 2024 Aug 10;21:31. doi: 10.18502/fid.v21i31.16193. eCollection 2024.
2
Interactive Large Group Lecture Demonstrations: Dramatization of Medical Neurobiology Concepts to Improve Student Perception of Understanding Fluid Mechanisms of the Central Nervous System.互动式大型团体讲座演示:将医学神经生物学概念戏剧化,以提高学生对中枢神经系统流体机制理解的认知。
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Apr 6;30(2):811-822. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00953-w. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia.学习动机策略问卷在沙特阿拉伯的有效性。
Int J Med Educ. 2018 Nov 30;9:309-315. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5bec.81cf.
4
Practical Insights for the Pharmacist Educator on Student Engagement.给药剂师教育工作者的关于学生参与度的实用见解
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Oct 25;80(8):143. doi: 10.5688/ajpe808143.
5
A School-Based Intervention to Increase Lyme Disease Preventive Measures Among Elementary School-Aged Children.一项基于学校的干预措施,旨在增加小学适龄儿童的莱姆病预防措施。
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016 Aug;16(8):507-15. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2016.1942. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
6
Mapping of the biomedical literature evaluation competencies based on pharmacy students' feedback.基于药学专业学生反馈的生物医学文献评价能力映射
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 12;16:59. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0583-7.
7
The Greatest Learning Return on Your Pedagogical Investment: Alignment, Assessment or In-Class Instruction?教学投资的最大学习回报:课程匹配、评估还是课堂教学?
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):e0137446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137446. eCollection 2015.
8
Interface between problem-based learning and a learner-centered paradigm.基于问题的学习与以学习者为中心的范式之间的接口。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 May 13;2:117-25. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S12794. Print 2011.
9
Bulimic learning.暴食症学习
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Oct 11;74(8):157. doi: 10.5688/aj7408157.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating student perceptions of a learner-centered drug literature evaluation course.评估学生对以学习者为中心的药物文献评估课程的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Dec 15;72(6):135. doi: 10.5688/aj7206135.

以学习者为中心的教学对三年级药物治疗课程中学习动机和学习策略的影响。

Effect of learner-centered teaching on motivation and learning strategies in a third-year pharmacotherapy course.

作者信息

Cheang Kai I

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0533, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 May 27;73(3):42. doi: 10.5688/aj730342.

DOI:10.5688/aj730342
PMID:19564985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2703280/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop, implement, and assess a learner-centered approach to teaching a third-year pharmacotherapy course in a doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) program.

METHODS

The pharmacotherapy course was restructured according to the learner-centered approach. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was administered to students before and after taking the course, and changes in MSLQ subscales from baseline were evaluated. Students' response to the learner-centered approach and characteristics associated with MSLQ scores were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, students' intrinsic goal orientation control of learning beliefs, self-efficacy, critical thinking, and metacognitive self-regulation improved after taking the course. Students responded positively to the learner-centered approach. Additionally, students with a clinical practice career orientation or who prepared frequently for classes scored higher on several MSLQ domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The learner-centered approach was effective in promoting several domains of motivation and learning strategies in a third-year pharmacotherapy course.

摘要

目的

在药学博士(PharmD)项目中开发、实施并评估一种以学习者为中心的三年级药物治疗课程教学方法。

方法

根据以学习者为中心的方法对药物治疗课程进行了重新设计。在课程前后对学生进行学习动机策略问卷(MSLQ)调查,并评估MSLQ各分量表相对于基线的变化。还评估了学生对以学习者为中心的方法的反应以及与MSLQ分数相关的特征。

结果

与基线相比,学生在学习本课程后,其内在目标导向、学习信念控制、自我效能感、批判性思维和元认知自我调节能力均有所提高。学生对以学习者为中心的方法反应积极。此外,具有临床实践职业导向或经常为课程做准备的学生在几个MSLQ领域得分更高。

结论

以学习者为中心的方法在促进三年级药物治疗课程的多个动机和学习策略领域方面是有效的。