Suppr超能文献

在C-7节段使用椎板螺钉作为挽救技术:使用尸体椎骨的计算机断层扫描和生物力学分析。实验室研究。

Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.

作者信息

Cardoso Mario J, Dmitriev Anton E, Helgeson Melvin D, Stephens Frederick, Campbell Victoria, Lehman Ronald A, Cooper Patrick, Rosner Michael K

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed Army medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jul;11(1):28-33. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08648.

Abstract

OBJECT

Transpedicular instrumentation at C-7 has been well accepted, but salvage techniques are limited. Lamina screws have been shown to be a biomechanically sound salvage technique in the proximal thoracic spine, but have not been evaluated in the lower cervical spine. The following study evaluates the anatomical feasibility of lamina screws at C-7 as well as their bone-screw interface strength as a salvage technique.

METHODS

Nine fresh-frozen C-7 cadaveric specimens were scanned for bone mineral density using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Prior to testing, all specimens were imaged using CT to obtain 1-mm axial sections. Caliper measurements of both pedicle width and laminar thickness were obtained. On the right side, pedicle screws were first inserted and then pulled out. Salvage intralaminar screws were inserted into the left lamina from the right spinous process/lamina junction and then pulled out. All screws were placed by experienced cervical spine surgeons under direct fluoroscopic visualization. Pedicle and lamina screws were 4.35- and 3.5-mm in diameter, respectively. Screws sizes were chosen based on direct and radiographic measurements of the respective anatomical regions. Insertional torque (IT) was measured in pounds per inch. Tensile loading to failure was performed in-line with the screw axis at a rate of 0.25 mm/sec using a MiniBionix II system with data recorded in Newtons.

RESULTS

Using lamina screws as a salvage technique generated mean pullout forces (778.9 +/- 161.4 N) similar to that of the index pedicle screws (805.3 +/- 261.7 N; p = 0.796). However, mean lamina screw peak IT (5.2 +/- 2.0 lbs/in) was significantly lower than mean index pedicle screw peak IT (9.1 +/- 3.6 lbs/in; p = 0.012). Bone mineral density was strongly correlated with pedicle screw pullout strength (r = 0.95) but less with lamina screw pullout strength (r = 0.04). The mean lamina width measured using calipers (5.7 +/- 1.0 mm) was significantly different from the CT-measured mean lamina width (5.1 +/- 0.8 mm; p = 0.003). Similarly, the mean pedicle width recorded with calipers (6.6 +/- 1.1 mm) was significantly different from the CT-measured mean pedicle width (6.2 +/- 1.3 mm; p = 0.014). The mean laminar width measured on CT at the thinnest point ranged from 3.8 to 6.8 mm, allowing a 3.5-mm screw to be placed without difficulty.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7 provides similar fixation strength as the index pedicle screw. The C-7 lamina appears to have an ideal anatomical width for the insertion of 3.5-mm screws commonly used for cervical fusions. Therefore, if the transpedicular screw fails, using intralaminar screws appear to be a biomechanically sound salvage technique.

摘要

目的

C7 椎弓根内固定已被广泛接受,但挽救技术有限。椎板螺钉已被证明是胸段近端脊柱一种生物力学上可靠的挽救技术,但尚未在颈椎下段进行评估。以下研究评估了 C7 椎板螺钉的解剖学可行性及其作为挽救技术的骨 - 螺钉界面强度。

方法

使用双能 X 线吸收法对 9 个新鲜冷冻的 C7 尸体标本进行骨密度扫描。在测试前,对所有标本进行 CT 成像以获得 1 毫米的轴向切片。用卡尺测量椎弓根宽度和椎板厚度。在右侧,先插入椎弓根螺钉,然后拔出。将挽救性椎板内螺钉从右侧棘突/椎板交界处插入左侧椎板,然后拔出。所有螺钉均由经验丰富的颈椎外科医生在直接荧光透视下置入。椎弓根螺钉和椎板螺钉的直径分别为 4.35 毫米和 3.5 毫米。根据相应解剖区域的直接测量和影像学测量选择螺钉尺寸。插入扭矩(IT)以磅每英寸为单位进行测量。使用 MiniBionix II 系统以 0.25 毫米/秒的速度沿螺钉轴线进行拉伸加载直至失效,数据以牛顿记录。

结果

使用椎板螺钉作为挽救技术产生的平均拔出力(778.9±161.4 牛)与初始椎弓根螺钉的平均拔出力(805.3±261.7 牛;p = 0.796)相似。然而,椎板螺钉的平均峰值 IT(5.2±2.0 磅/英寸)显著低于初始椎弓根螺钉的平均峰值 IT(9.1±3.6 磅/英寸;p = 0.012)。骨密度与椎弓根螺钉拔出强度密切相关(r = 0.95),但与椎板螺钉拔出强度的相关性较小(r = 0.04)。用卡尺测量的平均椎板宽度(5.7±1.0 毫米)与 CT 测量的平均椎板宽度(5.1±0.8 毫米;p = 0.003)有显著差异。同样,用卡尺记录的平均椎弓根宽度(6.6±1.1 毫米)与 CT 测量的平均椎弓根宽度(6.2±1.3 毫米;p = 0.014)有显著差异。在最薄点处 CT 测量的平均椎板宽度范围为 3.8 至 6.8 毫米,允许轻松置入 3.5 毫米的螺钉。

结论

这些结果表明,在 C7 使用椎板螺钉作为挽救技术可提供与初始椎弓根螺钉相似的固定强度。C7 椎板似乎具有适合插入常用于颈椎融合的 3.5 毫米螺钉的理想解剖宽度。因此,如果椎弓根螺钉失效,使用椎板内螺钉似乎是一种生物力学上可靠的挽救技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验