• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三维计算机断层扫描和手术模拟软件确定的C7椎板螺钉新轨迹:与既往轨迹的比较

A Novel Trajectory of C7 Laminar Screws Determined Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography and Surgical Simulation Software: Comparison with a Pre-existing Trajectory.

作者信息

Lee Chee Kean, Li Quan You, Park Jiwon, Park Sang-Min, Kim Ho-Joong, Chang Bong-Soon, Woo Byungjun, Yeom Jin S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Spine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2023 Aug;17(4):639-646. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0388. Epub 2023 May 2.

DOI:10.31616/asj.2022.0388
PMID:37127909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10460659/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Examination using three-dimensional screw trajectory software and computed tomographic scans.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of a novel trajectory for C7 laminar screws and to compare it with an old trajectory.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

The previously reported trajectory of C7 laminar screws has a horizontal direction without a fixed target point. Our new trajectory has a cephalad direction with a fixed target point.

METHODS

Computed tomographic scans of a total of 50 male and 50 female patients were utilized. The placement of C7 laminar screws was activated employing the new and old trajectories. The success rate, the causes of failure, and the maximum allowable length of each trajectory were compared.

RESULTS

Employing the new trajectory, the success rates of the unilaminar and bilaminar screws were 93% and 83%, respectively, which were significantly better than the old trajectory (80%, p<0.0001 and 70%, p=0.0003). The most prevalent cause of failure was laminar cortical breach followed by facet joint violation. The new trajectory also offered significantly longer maximum allowable screw length in unilaminar (32.5±4.3 mm vs. 26.5±2.6 mm, p<0.001), bilaminar cephalic (29.5±3.8 mm vs. 25.9±2.6 mm, p<0.0001) and bilaminar caudal (33.1±2.6 mm vs. 25.8±3.1 mm, p<0.001) screws than the old trajectory. With the new and old trajectories, 70% vs. 6% of unilaminar, 60% vs. 2% of bilaminar caudal, and 32% vs. 4% of bilaminar cephalic screws could be protracted perfectly into the corresponding lateral mass without any laminar cortical or facet joint violation (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel trajectory possesses a substantially higher success rate, longer maximum allowable screw length, and higher chance to be extended into the lateral mass (a condition known as a lamino-lateral mass screw) than the old trajectory.

摘要

研究设计

使用三维螺钉轨迹软件和计算机断层扫描进行检查。

目的

评估一种新型C7椎板螺钉轨迹的可行性,并将其与旧轨迹进行比较。

文献综述

先前报道的C7椎板螺钉轨迹为水平方向,没有固定靶点。我们的新轨迹为头侧方向,有一个固定靶点。

方法

共使用了50例男性和50例女性患者的计算机断层扫描。采用新旧轨迹放置C7椎板螺钉。比较成功率、失败原因以及每条轨迹的最大允许长度。

结果

采用新轨迹时,单层和双层螺钉的成功率分别为93%和83%,明显优于旧轨迹(80%,p<0.0001和70%,p=0.0003)。最常见的失败原因是椎板皮质破裂,其次是关节突关节侵犯。新轨迹在单层(32.5±4.3毫米对26.5±2.6毫米,p<0.001)、双层头侧(29.5±3.8毫米对25.9±2.6毫米,p<0.0001)和双层尾侧(33.1±2.6毫米对25.8±3.1毫米,p<0.001)螺钉中也提供了明显更长的最大允许螺钉长度。使用新旧轨迹时,70%对6%的单层、60%对2%的双层尾侧以及32%对4%的双层头侧螺钉能够完美地延伸到相应的侧块中,而没有任何椎板皮质或关节突关节侵犯(p<0.0001)。

结论

与旧轨迹相比,新型轨迹具有显著更高的成功率、更长的最大允许螺钉长度以及更高的延伸到侧块(一种称为椎板-侧块螺钉的情况)的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/55029d9648cc/asj-2022-0388f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/e0bb45fbabd7/asj-2022-0388f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/83dbce0fd694/asj-2022-0388f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/049e96905142/asj-2022-0388f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/700352b3e998/asj-2022-0388f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/55029d9648cc/asj-2022-0388f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/e0bb45fbabd7/asj-2022-0388f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/83dbce0fd694/asj-2022-0388f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/049e96905142/asj-2022-0388f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/700352b3e998/asj-2022-0388f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cf/10460659/55029d9648cc/asj-2022-0388f5.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Trajectory of C7 Laminar Screws Determined Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography and Surgical Simulation Software: Comparison with a Pre-existing Trajectory.使用三维计算机断层扫描和手术模拟软件确定的C7椎板螺钉新轨迹:与既往轨迹的比较
Asian Spine J. 2023 Aug;17(4):639-646. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0388. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
The feasibility of laminar screw placement in the subaxial spine: analysis using 215 three-dimensional computed tomography scans and simulation software.下颈椎层状螺钉放置的可行性:使用 215 例三维 CT 扫描和模拟软件进行分析。
Spine J. 2012 Jul;12(7):577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
3
Feasibility of laminar screw placement in the upper thoracic spine: analysis using 3-dimensional computed tomographic simulation.在上胸椎中进行层状螺钉放置的可行性:使用三维计算机断层扫描模拟进行分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):1146-53. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828aadf5.
4
Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.哪种挽救性固定技术最适合于颈胸交界处初次螺钉固定失败的情况?一项生物力学比较研究。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2417-2424. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5239-8. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Comparison of Three Different Options for C7 Posterior Vertebral Anchor in the Indian Population-Lateral Mass, Pedicle, and Lamina: A Computed Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis.印度人群中C7椎体后路锚定的三种不同选择——侧块、椎弓根和椎板的比较:基于计算机断层扫描的形态计量学分析
Asian Spine J. 2018 Aug;12(4):726-733. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.726. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
Anatomy of Lamina in the Subaxial Cervical Spine With the Special Reference to Translaminar Screws: CT and Cadaveric Analysis With Screw Trajectory Simulation.下颈椎椎板的解剖结构:特别提及经椎板螺钉固定,进行CT及尸体分析并模拟螺钉轨迹
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):E535-E539. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000159.
7
Preliminary experience with a novel facet-based lateral mass drill guide for the placement of lateral mass screws compared to freehand technique: a cadaveric study.新型基于关节突的侧块置钉导向器与徒手技术置入侧块螺钉的初步比较:尸体研究。
Spine J. 2023 Jun;23(6):912-920. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
8
Considerations for the use of C7 crossing laminar screws in subaxial and cervicothoracic instrumentation.考虑在下颈椎和颈胸段内固定中使用 C7 横突间钉。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):E199-204. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827de094.
9
Rate and Risk Factors of Superior Facet Joint Violation during Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement: A Comparison of Robot-Assisted Approach with a Conventional Technique.皮质骨轨迹螺钉置入时上关节突关节面破坏的发生率和危险因素:机器人辅助入路与传统技术的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):133-140. doi: 10.1111/os.12598. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
10
Radiological analysis of minimal safe distance and optimal screw angle to avoid facet violation in open-door laminoplasty using precontoured plate.使用预塑形钢板行开门椎板成形术时避免小关节损伤的最小安全距离和最佳螺钉角度的影像学分析
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Sep-Dec;25(3):2309499017736562. doi: 10.1177/2309499017736562.

本文引用的文献

1
Considerations for the use of C7 crossing laminar screws in subaxial and cervicothoracic instrumentation.考虑在下颈椎和颈胸段内固定中使用 C7 横突间钉。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):E199-204. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827de094.
2
The feasibility of laminar screw placement in the subaxial spine: analysis using 215 three-dimensional computed tomography scans and simulation software.下颈椎层状螺钉放置的可行性:使用 215 例三维 CT 扫描和模拟软件进行分析。
Spine J. 2012 Jul;12(7):577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
3
Translaminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine: quantitative laminar analysis and feasibility of unilateral and bilateral translaminar virtual screw placement.
经关节突螺钉固定在下颈椎:定量椎板分析及单侧和双侧经关节突虚拟螺钉置钉的可行性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):E745-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824c70ef.
4
Biomechanical comparison of three different types of C7 fixation techniques.三种不同类型的C7固定技术的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 1;36(5):393-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d345e0.
5
Clinical and radiologic outcome of laminar screw at C2 and C7 for posterior instrumentation--review of 25 cases and comparison of C2 and C7 intralaminar screw fixation.颈椎后路椎板螺钉固定的临床和影像学结果:25 例回顾分析及 C2、C7 椎板间螺钉固定的比较
World Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;73(2):112-8; discussion e15. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.06.010. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
6
Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.在C-7节段使用椎板螺钉作为挽救技术:使用尸体椎骨的计算机断层扫描和生物力学分析。实验室研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jul;11(1):28-33. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08648.
7
Significance of laminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine.下颈椎椎弓根螺钉固定的意义
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 15;33(16):1739-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d2aa2.
8
Posterior cervical spine arthrodesis with laminar screws: a report of two cases.后路颈椎融合术结合椎板螺钉:两例报告。
Acta Med Okayama. 2007 Apr;61(2):115-9. doi: 10.18926/AMO/32889.
9
Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.颈椎椎弓根螺钉与侧块螺钉:单平面疲劳分析及残余拔出强度
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.019.
10
A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.颈椎胸段交界处椎弓根螺钉与侧块螺钉结构刚度的比较:一项生物力学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):E636-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184750.80067.a1.