Gilbert Nathan F, Yasko Alan W, Oates Scott D, Lewis Valerae O, Cannon Christopher P, Lin Patrick P
Department of Orthopaedic, Oncology-Unit 408, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1646-56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01542.
Allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the tibia is one option following resection of a skeletal tumor. Previous studies with use of this technique have found a high prevalence of complications, including fracture, infection, extensor mechanism insufficiency, and loosening. To address some of these problems, we adopted certain measures, including muscle flap coverage, meticulous tendon reconstruction, rigid implant fixation, and careful rehabilitation. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the functional outcome and complications in patients undergoing allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the tibia.
Twelve patients who underwent allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the tibia after tumor resection were retrospectively evaluated at a median follow-up of forty-nine months. Clinical records and radiographs were reviewed to evaluate patient outcome, healing at the allograft-host junction, function, construct survival, and complications.
Nine patients had no extensor lag, and three patients had 5 degrees to 15 degrees of extensor lag. The mean amount of knee flexion was 103 degrees (range, 60 degrees to 120 degrees ). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24.3 (81%) of a maximum of 30. Complete bone union occurred in nine patients, and partial union occurred in three patients. At the time of writing, no secondary bone-grafting procedures had been required to achieve union, and no revision or removal of the reconstruction had been performed. Rotational or free flaps provided satisfactory wound coverage in all patients. A deep infection occurred in one patient whose allograft and prosthesis were successfully retained after treatment with surgical débridement and intravenous antibiotics.
After osteoarticular resection of destructive tumors of the proximal part of the tibia, an allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction can provide consistently good functional results with an acceptably low complication rate. Technical aspects of the procedure that may favorably affect outcome include soft-tissue coverage with muscle flaps and rigid fixation with a long-stemmed implant.
同种异体骨-假体复合重建胫骨近端是骨骼肿瘤切除后的一种选择。以往使用该技术的研究发现并发症发生率很高,包括骨折、感染、伸肌机制功能不全和松动。为了解决其中一些问题,我们采取了某些措施,包括肌瓣覆盖、细致的肌腱重建、坚强的植入物固定和精心的康复治疗。本研究的目的是评估接受胫骨近端同种异体骨-假体复合重建患者的功能结果和并发症。
对12例肿瘤切除后接受胫骨近端同种异体骨-假体复合重建的患者进行回顾性评估,中位随访时间为49个月。回顾临床记录和X线片以评估患者的结果、同种异体骨与宿主骨结合处的愈合情况、功能、重建物的存活情况和并发症。
9例患者无伸肌滞后,3例患者有5度至15度的伸肌滞后。膝关节平均屈曲度为103度(范围为60度至120度)。肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会平均评分为24.3分(满分30分中的81%)。9例患者实现了完全骨愈合,3例患者部分愈合。在撰写本文时,无需进行二次植骨手术来实现愈合,也未对重建物进行翻修或移除。旋转皮瓣或游离皮瓣为所有患者提供了满意的伤口覆盖。1例患者发生深部感染,经手术清创和静脉使用抗生素治疗后,其同种异体骨和假体成功保留。
在对胫骨近端破坏性肿瘤进行骨关节切除后,同种异体骨-假体复合重建可提供持续良好的功能结果,并发症发生率可接受且较低。可能对结果产生有利影响的手术技术方面包括用肌瓣进行软组织覆盖和用长柄植入物进行坚强固定。