Bachmanov Alexander A, Inoue Masashi, Ji Hong, Murata Yuko, Tordoff Michael G, Beauchamp Gary K
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Sep;90(3):756S-763S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27462L. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
This article provides an overview of our studies of variation in voluntary glutamate consumption in mice. In 2-bottle preference tests, mice from the C57BL/6ByJ (B6) strain consume more monosodium l-glutamate (MSG) than do mice from the 129P3/J (129) strain. We used these mice to study physiologic and genetic mechanisms that underlie the strain differences in glutamate intake. Our genetic analyses showed that differences between B6 mice and 129 mice in MSG consumption are unrelated to strain variation in consumption of sodium or sweeteners and therefore are attributed to mechanisms specific for glutamate. These strain differences could be due to variation in responses to either taste or postingestive effects of glutamate. To examine the role of taste responsiveness, we measured MSG-evoked activity in gustatory nerves and showed that it is similar in B6 and 129 mice. On the other hand, strain-specific postingestive effects of glutamate were evident from our finding that exposure to MSG increases its consumption in B6 mice and decreases its consumption in 129 mice. We therefore examined whether B6 mice and 129 mice differ in postingestive metabolism of glutamate. We showed that, after intragastric administration of MSG, the MSG is preferentially metabolized through gluconeogenesis in B6 mice, whereas thermogenesis is the predominant process for 129 mice. We hypothesize that a process related to gluconeogenesis of the ingested glutamate generates the rewarding stimulus, which probably occurs in the liver before glucose enters the general circulation, and that the glutamate-induced postingestive thermogenesis generates an aversive stimulus. Our animal model studies raise the question of whether humans also vary in glutamate metabolism in a manner that influences their glutamate preference, consumption, and postingestive processing.
本文概述了我们对小鼠自愿摄入谷氨酸变化的研究。在双瓶偏好测试中,C57BL/6ByJ(B6)品系的小鼠比129P3/J(129)品系的小鼠消耗更多的l-谷氨酸单钠(MSG)。我们利用这些小鼠研究谷氨酸摄入量品系差异背后的生理和遗传机制。我们的遗传分析表明,B6小鼠和129小鼠在MSG消耗上的差异与钠或甜味剂消耗的品系差异无关,因此归因于谷氨酸特有的机制。这些品系差异可能是由于对谷氨酸味觉或摄入后效应反应的变化。为了研究味觉反应性的作用,我们测量了味觉神经中MSG诱发的活性,结果表明B6和129小鼠的该活性相似。另一方面,我们发现谷氨酸对B6小鼠和129小鼠具有品系特异性的摄入后效应,即接触MSG会增加B6小鼠对其的消耗,而减少129小鼠对其的消耗。因此,我们研究了B6小鼠和129小鼠在谷氨酸摄入后代谢方面是否存在差异。我们发现,胃内给予MSG后,MSG在B6小鼠中优先通过糖异生代谢,而在129小鼠中,产热是主要过程。我们推测,与摄入的谷氨酸糖异生相关的过程产生了奖赏性刺激,这可能发生在葡萄糖进入全身循环之前的肝脏中,而谷氨酸诱导的摄入后产热产生了厌恶刺激。我们的动物模型研究提出了一个问题,即人类在谷氨酸代谢方面是否也存在差异,从而影响他们对谷氨酸的偏好、消耗和摄入后处理。