文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus vaccination in the Netherlands.

作者信息

de Kok Inge M C M, van Ballegooijen Marjolein, Habbema J Dik F

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Aug 5;101(15):1083-92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp183. Epub 2009 Jul 1.


DOI:10.1093/jnci/djp183
PMID:19571256
Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, low cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates might limit the cost-effectiveness of vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV). We examined the effect on cervical cancer incidence and mortality of adding HPV vaccination to the current Dutch cervical cancer screening situation and calculated the cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Costs and effects were estimated under favorable assumptions (ie, that HPV vaccination provides lifelong protection against 70% of all cervical cancers, has no side effects, and is administered to all women regardless of their risk of cervical cancer) by using the microsimulation screening analysis (MISCAN) model. The impact of changes in the price of vaccination, number of booster vaccinations, vaccination attendance rate, vaccination efficacy, cervical cancer incidence level, and quality-of-life assumptions was investigated in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Using the current price of euro118 per vaccine dose and with discounting of costs and effects at an annual rate of 3%, adding HPV vaccination to the current Dutch screening situation had a cost-effectiveness ratio of euro53 500 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The threshold price per vaccine dose at which the cost-effectiveness of vaccination would correspond to an acceptability threshold of euro20 000 per QALY gained was euro40. With the addition of one or more (up to four) booster vaccinations during a lifetime, this threshold price decreased to euro33 for one booster (to euro16 for four boosters). With a doubling of the cervical cancer incidence level, the cost-effectiveness ratio was euro24 400 per QALY gained and the maximum price per dose at threshold of euro20 000 was euro97. All threshold prices were lower under less favorable effectiveness assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, HPV vaccination is not cost-effective even under favorable assumptions. To become cost-effective, the vaccine price would have to be decreased considerably, depending on the effectiveness of the vaccine.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus vaccination in the Netherlands.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009-8-5

[2]
The clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination for adult women in the Netherlands.

Vaccine. 2011-9-22

[3]
How to screen for cervical cancer after HPV16/18 vaccination in The Netherlands.

Vaccine. 2009-8-13

[4]
Cost-effectiveness of human papilloma virus vaccination in Iceland.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009

[5]
Would the effect of HPV vaccination on non-cervical HPV-positive cancers make the difference for its cost-effectiveness?

Eur J Cancer. 2011-2

[6]
Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus 16/18 for the prevention of cervical cancer: adaptation of an existing cohort model to the situation in the Netherlands.

Vaccine. 2009-7-30

[7]
The potential cost-effectiveness of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to the cervical cancer screening programme in South Africa.

Vaccine. 2009-10-19

[8]
Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Belgium: do not forget about cervical cancer screening.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009-4

[9]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in France.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008

[10]
Health and economic outcomes of HPV 16,18 vaccination in 72 GAVI-eligible countries.

Vaccine. 2008-7-29

引用本文的文献

[1]
Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in the context of routine HPV vaccination by optimizing screening strategies with respect to vaccine uptake: a modeling analysis.

BMC Med. 2023-2-10

[2]
Are intersectoral costs considered in economic evaluations of interventions relating to sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A systematic review.

BMC Public Health. 2022-11-25

[3]
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Tumors versus Standard of Care.

Curr Oncol. 2021-5-13

[4]
Adherence to Discounting Guidelines: Evidence from Over 2000 Published Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2020-8

[5]
Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Germany.

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017-9-4

[6]
Cervical intraepithelial lesions in females attending Women's Health Clinics in Alexandria, Egypt.

Cytojournal. 2015-6-23

[7]
Prevalence of human papillomavirus in head and neck cancers in European populations: a meta-analysis.

BMC Cancer. 2014-12-17

[8]
Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of the vaccination against HPV in Brazil.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014

[9]
Is human papillomavirus vaccination likely to be a useful strategy in India?

South Asian J Cancer. 2013-10

[10]
Using Simulation Modeling to Inform Strategies to Reduce Breast Cancer Mortality in Black Women in the District of Columbia.

Epidemiol Res Int. 2012-4-26

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索