• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项肢体运动方案中对正常老年人表现的评估:年龄、性别和教育程度的影响。

Evaluation of the performance of normal elderly in a limb praxis protocol: influence of age, gender, and education.

作者信息

Rodrigues Cavalcante Karla, Caramelli Paulo

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Taubaté, Taubaté (SP), Brazil.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Jul;15(4):618-22. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709090663.

DOI:10.1017/S1355617709090663
PMID:19573281
Abstract

Limb praxis can be influenced by age, gender, and education. The present study investigated the influence of these variables on gesture production by healthy elderly subjects. We evaluated 96 individuals divided into two age groups (60-74 and 75-88 years). Each group contained 48 men and 48 women and was subdivided into four groups according to education: illiterates and 1-3, 4-7, and 8 or more years of education. Individuals were requested to carry out tasks on verbal command and imitation. There were no differences between the performance of men and women, while older individuals performed worse than their younger counterparts. Regarding educational level, three major groups emerged: illiterates, individuals with 1-7 years of education, and those with 8 or more years of education. In conclusion, age and education significantly influenced the performance of individuals in limb praxis tests.

摘要

肢体运用能力会受到年龄、性别和教育程度的影响。本研究调查了这些变量对健康老年受试者手势产生的影响。我们评估了96名个体,分为两个年龄组(60 - 74岁和75 - 88岁)。每组包含48名男性和48名女性,并根据教育程度细分为四组:文盲以及接受1 - 3年、4 - 7年和8年及以上教育的人群。要求个体根据口头指令和模仿进行任务。男性和女性的表现没有差异,而年龄较大的个体比年轻个体表现更差。关于教育水平,出现了三个主要组:文盲、接受1 - 7年教育的个体以及接受8年及以上教育的个体。总之,年龄和教育程度显著影响了个体在肢体运用测试中的表现。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the performance of normal elderly in a limb praxis protocol: influence of age, gender, and education.在一项肢体运动方案中对正常老年人表现的评估:年龄、性别和教育程度的影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Jul;15(4):618-22. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709090663.
2
[A neuropsychological and functional brain imaging study of visuo-imitative apraxia].[视觉模仿失用症的神经心理学与功能性脑成像研究]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2000 May;156(5):459-72.
3
Cognitive approach to the assessment of limb apraxia.评估肢体失用症的认知方法。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan;22(1):27-45. doi: 10.1080/13854040601139310.
4
Effects of age, education and gender on verbal fluency.年龄、教育程度和性别对言语流畅性的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Dec;25(8):1057-64. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.8.1057.16736.
5
[Constructive praxis to the copy: extended standards of the Barcelona test].
Neurologia. 1998 Aug-Sep;13(7):329-34.
6
A model-based approach to long-term recovery of limb apraxia after stroke.基于模型的方法治疗脑卒中后肢体失用症的长期康复。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;33(9):954-71. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.578570. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
7
Neuropsychological assessment of executive functions in women: effects of age and education.女性执行功能的神经心理学评估:年龄和教育程度的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2005 Sep;19(5):566-77. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.566.
8
Error analysis of limb and orofacial praxis in children with developmental motor deficits.发育性运动障碍儿童肢体与口面部动作的错误分析
Brain Cogn. 1993 Nov;23(2):203-21. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1993.1055.
9
Pantomime recognition impairment in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病中的手势识别障碍。
Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):177-81.
10
Normative study of the Stroop Color and Word Test in an educationally diverse elderly population.教育背景各异的老年人群中Stroop颜色与文字测验的规范性研究
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;23(10):1020-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.2027.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential Lesion Patterns Associated With Stroke-Induced Apraxia in Women and Men.与中风诱发的失用症相关的女性和男性的不同病变模式。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 May;32(5):e70201. doi: 10.1111/ene.70201.
2
Bimanual Gesture Imitation Links to Cognition and Olfaction.双手手势模仿与认知和嗅觉有关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Dec;67(12):2581-2586. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16151. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
3
Early Cognitive, Structural, and Microstructural Changes in Presymptomatic C9orf72 Carriers Younger Than 40 Years.40 岁以下 C9orf72 携带者的早期认知、结构和微观结构变化。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Feb 1;75(2):236-245. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4266.
4
Are Older Adults Less Embodied? A Review of Age Effects through the Lens of Embodied Cognition.老年人的身体体验更少吗?基于具身认知视角对年龄效应的综述。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 27;8:267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00267. eCollection 2017.
5
Spatial representations in older adults are not modified by action: Evidence from tool use.老年人的空间表征不会因动作而改变:来自工具使用的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Sep;30(3):656-68. doi: 10.1037/pag0000029. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
6
The Neuroscience of Storing and Molding Tool Action Concepts: How "Plastic" is Grounded Cognition?工具动作概念的存储和塑造的神经科学:具身认知有多“灵活”?
Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 15;1:195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00195. eCollection 2010.