Moulik Satya P, Mitra Debolina
Centre for Surface Science, Department of Chemistry, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India.
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009 Sep 15;337(2):569-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.064. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
In this article, discrepancies between the enthalpies of micellization of amphiphiles in aqueous solution determined by the methods of van't Hoff (VH) and calorimetry have been addressed. The contributions of the hydrophobic interaction, electrostatic interaction and the micellar size effect have been considered to assess the total picture of the amphiphile self-association process and related energetic parameters, especially the enthalpy and the specific heat capacity. Literature results on 23 amphiphile systems (six nonionics, five anionics, and twelve cationics) have been analyzed, and the assessed enthalpies by VH method and direct calorimetry have been presented and compared. VH results considering participation of 5% of total amphiphile monomer to form micelle at cmc have been also compared. In addition to this, the changes in the standard specific heat of micellization for all the amphiphile aggregation processes evaluated by the VH and calorimetry procedures have been presented. The differences between the standard enthalpy of micellization DeltaH(m)(o) by the methods of VH and calorimetry are minor for nonionic surfactants but major for ionics, whereas the standard specific heat capacities of micellization (DeltaC(Pm)(o)) by both the procedures fairly agree for all types of surfactants. Like DeltaH(m)(o)-DeltaS(m)(o) compensation observed in kinetic and equilibrium processes, a linear correlation between Lt(T-->0)DeltaH(m)(o) and DeltaC(Pm)(o) has been observed with no distinction between the VH and calorimetry derived results for all the surfactant systems herein dealt with.
在本文中,已经探讨了通过范特霍夫(VH)法和量热法测定的两亲物在水溶液中的胶束化焓之间的差异。考虑了疏水相互作用、静电相互作用和胶束尺寸效应的贡献,以评估两亲物自缔合过程的全貌以及相关的能量参数,特别是焓和比热容。分析了23个两亲物体系(6个非离子型、5个阴离子型和12个阳离子型)的文献结果,并给出并比较了通过VH法和直接量热法评估的焓。还比较了考虑在临界胶束浓度(cmc)下5%的总两亲物单体参与形成胶束的VH结果。除此之外,还给出了通过VH法和量热法程序评估的所有两亲物聚集过程的胶束化标准比热容的变化。对于非离子表面活性剂,VH法和量热法测得的胶束化标准焓ΔHm(o)之间的差异较小,但对于离子型表面活性剂则较大,而两种方法测得的胶束化标准比热容(ΔCPm(o))对于所有类型的表面活性剂都相当一致。如同在动力学和平衡过程中观察到的ΔHm(o)-ΔSm(o)补偿一样,在此处理的所有表面活性剂体系中,观察到了Lt(T→0)ΔHm(o)与ΔCPm(o)之间的线性相关性,VH法和量热法得出的结果并无区别。