Sinclair Lynne B, Lingard Lorelei A, Mohabeer Ravindra N
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jul;90(7):1196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.021.
To explore team structures, team relationships, and organizational culture constituting interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in a particular rehabilitation setting; to develop a description of IPC practice that may be translated, adapted, and operationalized in other clinical environments.
An ethnographic study involving: Field observations: 40 hours, over 4 weeks, daily activities, 7 interprofessional meetings, 3 care planning meetings, 1 business meeting, and 3 family meetings; Individual observations: a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist, and a social worker individually observed for 45 minutes to an hour; and Interviews: 19 participants, 11 professions, 27 informal, 5 formal interviews. Data analysis consisted of an iterative process involving coding field notes for themes by 3 members of the research team by qualitative analysis software.
Single inpatient spinal cord rehabilitation care unit in a Canadian urban academic rehabilitation hospital.
Purposive convenience sample of core team, more than 40 professionals: physiatrist, over 21 nurses, 3 physiotherapists, 3 occupational therapists, 2 social workers, chaplain, psychologist, therapeutic recreationist, program assistant, program manager, pharmacist, advanced practice leader, 6 students (1 pharmacy, 4 registered nurse, and 1 psychology), and on-site community organizations. After university and hospital ethical approvals, all staff members were recruited to participate in the study.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Recurrent examples of IPC fit 2 dominant themes: team culture (divided into leadership, care philosophy, relationships, and the context of practice) and communication structures (both formal and informal).
IPC practice in rehabilitation care is supported by clinical, cultural, and organizational factors. This understanding of daily IPC work may guide initiatives to promote IPC in other clinical team settings.
探讨在特定康复环境中构成跨专业协作(IPC)的团队结构、团队关系及组织文化;构建一份IPC实践描述,以便在其他临床环境中进行转化、调整并实施。
一项人种志研究,包括:实地观察:为期4周,共40小时,观察日常活动、7次跨专业会议、3次护理计划会议、1次业务会议及3次家属会议;个体观察:对一名物理治疗师、一名职业治疗师和一名社会工作者分别进行45分钟至1小时的观察;访谈:19名参与者,涉及11个专业,27次非正式访谈和5次正式访谈。数据分析采用迭代过程,由研究团队的3名成员通过定性分析软件对实地记录进行主题编码。
加拿大城市学术康复医院的单一住院脊髓康复护理单元。
核心团队的立意便利样本,40多名专业人员:物理医学与康复医师、21名以上护士、3名物理治疗师、3名职业治疗师、2名社会工作者、牧师、心理学家、治疗性娱乐师、项目助理、项目经理、药剂师、高级实践负责人、6名学生(1名药学专业、4名注册护士和1名心理学专业)以及现场社区组织。经大学和医院伦理批准后,招募所有工作人员参与研究。
不适用。
不适用。
IPC的反复实例符合2个主要主题:团队文化(分为领导力、护理理念、关系及实践背景)和沟通结构(包括正式和非正式)。
康复护理中的IPC实践受到临床、文化和组织因素的支持。对日常IPC工作的这种理解可能会指导在其他临床团队环境中促进IPC的举措。