• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何管理组织变革并创建实践团队:一家南非初级保健健康中心的经验

How to manage organisational change and create practice teams: experiences of a South African primary care health centre.

作者信息

Mash B J, Mayers P, Conradie H, Orayn A, Kuiper M, Marais J

机构信息

Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.

出版信息

Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008 Jul;21(2):132. Epub 2008 Aug 26.

PMID:19039745
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In South Africa, first-contact primary care is delivered by nurses in small clinics and larger community health centres (CHC). CHCs also employ doctors, who often work in isolation from the nurses, with poor differentiation of roles and little effective teamwork or communication. Worcester CHC, a typical public sector CHC in rural South Africa, decided to explore how to create more successful practice teams of doctors and nurses. This paper is based on their experience of both unsuccessful and successful attempts to introduce practice teams and reports on their learning regarding organisational change.

METHODS

An emergent action research study design utilised a co-operative inquiry group. The first nine months of inquiry focused on understanding the initial unsuccessful attempt to create practice teams. This paper reports primarily on the subsequent nine months (four cycles of planning, action, observation and reflection) during which practice teams were re-introduced. The central question was how more effective practice teams of doctors and nurses could be created. The group utilised outcome mapping to assist with planning, monitoring and evaluation. Outcome mapping defined a vision, mission, boundary partners, outcome challenges, progress markers and strategies for the desired changes and supported quantitative monitoring of the process. Qualitative data were derived from the co-operative inquiry group (CIG) meetings and interviews with doctors, nurses, practice teams and patients.

FINDINGS

The CIG engaged effectively with 68% of the planned strategies, and more than 60% of the progress markers were achieved for clinical nurse practitioners, doctors, support staff and managers, but not for patients. Key themes that emerged from the inquiry group's reflection on their experience of the change process dealt with the amount of interaction, type of communication, team resilience, staff satisfaction, leadership style, reflective capacity, experimentation and evolution of new structures.

CONCLUSION

The group's learning supported a view of change that sees the organisation as a living system in which information flow, participation and the development of resilience are key aspects. These themes fit well into an understanding of change based on complexity theory. If managers of the health system wish to enhance organisational change, then their goal may need to shift from optimising health care delivery in a mechanistic model to optimising health care workers in a living system.

摘要

背景

在南非,首次接触式初级保健由小型诊所和较大的社区卫生中心(CHC)的护士提供。社区卫生中心也雇佣医生,他们通常与护士独立工作,角色区分不明确,几乎没有有效的团队合作或沟通。伍斯特社区卫生中心是南非农村地区一个典型的公共部门社区卫生中心,决定探索如何创建更成功的医生和护士执业团队。本文基于他们在引入执业团队的不成功和成功尝试中的经验,并报告了他们在组织变革方面的学习成果。

方法

一项新兴的行动研究采用了合作探究小组的设计。前九个月的探究重点是了解创建执业团队的最初不成功尝试。本文主要报告随后的九个月(四个规划、行动、观察和反思周期),在此期间重新引入了执业团队。核心问题是如何创建更有效的医生和护士执业团队。该小组利用成果映射来协助规划、监测和评估。成果映射定义了愿景、使命、边界伙伴、成果挑战、进展标志以及期望变革的策略,并支持对过程进行定量监测。定性数据来自合作探究小组(CIG)会议以及对医生、护士、执业团队和患者的访谈。

结果

合作探究小组有效地实施了68%的计划策略,临床护士从业者、医生、辅助人员和管理人员实现了60%以上的进展标志,但患者未实现。探究小组对变革过程经验的反思中出现的关键主题涉及互动量、沟通类型、团队适应力、员工满意度、领导风格、反思能力、实验以及新结构的演变。

结论

该小组的学习支持了一种变革观点,即将组织视为一个生命系统,其中信息流、参与和适应力的发展是关键方面。这些主题与基于复杂性理论的变革理解非常契合。如果卫生系统的管理者希望加强组织变革,那么他们的目标可能需要从在机械模型中优化医疗服务提供转变为在生命系统中优化医护人员。

相似文献

1
How to manage organisational change and create practice teams: experiences of a South African primary care health centre.如何管理组织变革并创建实践团队:一家南非初级保健健康中心的经验
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008 Jul;21(2):132. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
2
Partners in care: investigating community nurses' understanding of an interdisciplinary team-based approach to primary care.护理合作伙伴:调查社区护士对基于跨学科团队的初级护理方法的理解。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Nov;17(22):3004-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02068.x.
3
The organisational context of nursing care in stroke units: a case study approach.卒中单元护理的组织背景:一项案例研究方法
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jan;46(1):85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
4
Towards multidisciplinary assessment of older people: exploring the change process.迈向老年人多学科评估:探索变革过程。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Apr;14(4):518-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01085.x.
5
The impact of organisational and individual factors on team communication in surgery: a qualitative study.组织因素和个体因素对手术团队沟通的影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):732-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
6
Learning to plan? A critical fiction about the facilitation of professional and practice development plans in primary care.学习制定计划?关于在初级保健中推动专业和实践发展计划的一个关键虚构故事。
J Interprof Care. 2002 Nov;16(4):349-58. doi: 10.1080/1356182021000008274.
7
Multidisciplinary teamwork in US primary health care.美国初级卫生保健中的多学科团队合作。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Aug;65(3):622-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.028. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
8
Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation.在姑息治疗中建立管理型临床网络:一项现实评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Feb;44(2):183-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.027. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
9
Joint working in community mental health teams: implementation of an integrated care pathway.社区精神卫生团队的联合协作:综合护理路径的实施
Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Nov;12(6):527-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00523.x.
10
What are the effects of distance management on the retention of remote area nurses in Australia?距离管理对澳大利亚偏远地区护士留任意愿有何影响?
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):652. Epub 2007 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Periodic Formative Assessments on Learning Through the Lens of the Complex Adaptive System and Social Sustainability Principles.从复杂适应系统和社会可持续性原则的视角看定期形成性评估对学习的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41072. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41072. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 6. Recruitment, training, and continuing education.新时代的社区卫生工作者:6. 招聘、培训和继续教育。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Oct 12;19(Suppl 3):113. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00757-3.
3
We Need to Talk About Complexity in Health Research: Findings From a Focused Ethnography.
我们需要谈谈健康研究中的复杂性:一项聚焦人种志的研究结果
Qual Health Res. 2021 Jan;31(2):338-348. doi: 10.1177/1049732320968779. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
4
Health system resilience: a literature review of empirical research.卫生系统韧性:实证研究的文献综述
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Oct 1;35(8):1084-1109. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa032.
5
Resilient Health Care: a systematic review of conceptualisations, study methods and factors that develop resilience.弹性医疗保健:对概念化、研究方法和发展弹性因素的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05208-3.
6
Baseline measures of primary health care team functioning and overall primary health care performance at Du Noon Community Health Centre.杜农社区健康中心初级卫生保健团队运作及总体初级卫生保健绩效的基线测量。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Sep 5;10(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1458.
7
Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them.组织参与式研究:一项系统的混合研究综述,揭示了其额外的益处以及与之相关的关键因素。
Implement Sci. 2017 Oct 10;12(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0648-y.
8
Assessing the facilitators and barriers of interdisciplinary team working in primary care using normalisation process theory: An integrative review.运用规范化过程理论评估初级保健中跨学科团队合作的促进因素和障碍:一项综合综述。
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177026. eCollection 2017.
9
Scoping review of complexity theory in health services research.卫生服务研究中复杂性理论的综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 12;16:87. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1343-4.
10
African primary care research: participatory action research.非洲初级保健研究:参与式行动研究。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014 Mar 5;6(1):E1-5. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.585.