Kogon Brian, Plattner Courtney, Kirshbom Paul, Kanter Kirk, Leong Traci, Lyle Theresa, Jennings Staci, McConnell Mike, Book Wendy
Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jul;138(1):103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.02.020. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
Congenital heart defects with a component of pulmonary stenosis are often palliated in childhood by disrupting the pulmonary valve, either by means of dilation or excision. It is unclear what factors affect a patient's ability to tolerate long-term pulmonary insufficiency before requiring pulmonary valve replacement. We analyze potential factors that are related to the interval between pulmonary valve disruption and pulmonary valve replacement.
One hundred seven patients were analyzed. They had a congenital diagnosis of pulmonary stenosis or tetralogy of Fallot, had their first pulmonary valve replacement between 2002 and 2008, and had a known interval between pulmonary valve disruption and pulmonary valve replacement. The median age at the time of surgical intervention was 2 years for pulmonary valve disruption (range, 0-56 years) and 26 years for pulmonary valve replacement (range, 1-72 years). The median interval was 23 years (range, 0-51 years). Potential related factors were sex, race, initial diagnosis and procedure, age at pulmonary valve disruption, prior shunt operation, presence of branch pulmonary artery stenosis, and degree of pulmonary regurgitation.
As determined by using univariate analysis, male patients had a shorter interval than female patients (median, 16 vs 26 years; P = .01), and African American patients had a shorter interval than white patients (median, 16 vs 25 years; P = .049). A significant correlation was also identified between age at the time of pulmonary valve disruption and the subsequent interval to pulmonary valve replacement. Overall, the interval tended to increase as age at disruption increased (P < .0001). Although the presence of branch pulmonary artery stenosis determined by the need for concomitant pulmonary arterioplasty was associated with a significantly shorter interval to pulmonary valve replacement (21 vs 24 years, P = .02), stenosis determined based on small branch pulmonary artery diameter was correlated to a prolonged interval to pulmonary valve replacement (P = .009). Initial diagnosis, prior palliative shunt operation, and degree of pulmonary regurgitation had no effect on the interval between pulmonary valve disruption and subsequent pulmonary valve replacement. As determined by using multivariate analysis, only male sex and small pulmonary artery diameter remained significant factors.
Male sex appears to shorten the interval between pulmonary valve disruption and pulmonary valve replacement, whereas small branch pulmonary artery diameter appears to lengthen the interval. Knowing which factors are detrimental and which are protective might help identify patients who are prone to a more rapid progression of right heart failure from free pulmonary insufficiency, possibly steering them toward more frequent follow-up or more aggressive heart failure medical regimens.
伴有肺动脉狭窄成分的先天性心脏病在儿童期常通过扩张或切除等方式破坏肺动脉瓣来进行姑息治疗。目前尚不清楚哪些因素会影响患者在需要进行肺动脉瓣置换之前耐受长期肺动脉瓣关闭不全的能力。我们分析了与肺动脉瓣破坏至肺动脉瓣置换间隔时间相关的潜在因素。
对107例患者进行分析。他们先天性诊断为肺动脉狭窄或法洛四联症,在2002年至2008年间首次进行肺动脉瓣置换,且已知肺动脉瓣破坏至肺动脉瓣置换的间隔时间。肺动脉瓣破坏时手术干预的中位年龄为2岁(范围0 - 56岁),肺动脉瓣置换时为26岁(范围1 - 72岁)。中位间隔时间为23年(范围0 - 51年)。潜在相关因素包括性别、种族、初始诊断和手术、肺动脉瓣破坏时的年龄、既往分流手术、分支肺动脉狭窄的存在情况以及肺动脉反流程度。
单因素分析显示,男性患者的间隔时间短于女性患者(中位值分别为16年和26年;P = 0.01),非裔美国患者的间隔时间短于白人患者(中位值分别为16年和25年;P = 0.049)。肺动脉瓣破坏时的年龄与随后至肺动脉瓣置换的间隔时间之间也存在显著相关性。总体而言,随着破坏时年龄的增加,间隔时间有延长趋势(P < 0.0001)。尽管通过是否需要同期进行肺动脉成形术确定的分支肺动脉狭窄与肺动脉瓣置换的间隔时间显著缩短相关(21年对24年,P = 0.02),但基于分支肺动脉直径小确定的狭窄与肺动脉瓣置换间隔时间延长相关(P = 0.009)。初始诊断、既往姑息性分流手术和肺动脉反流程度对肺动脉瓣破坏至随后肺动脉瓣置换的间隔时间无影响。多因素分析显示,只有男性性别和小肺动脉直径仍然是显著因素。
男性性别似乎会缩短肺动脉瓣破坏至肺动脉瓣置换的间隔时间,而分支肺动脉直径小似乎会延长该间隔时间。了解哪些因素有害哪些因素有保护作用可能有助于识别那些因肺动脉瓣关闭不全而更容易快速进展为右心衰竭的患者,可能促使他们接受更频繁的随访或更积极的心力衰竭治疗方案。