Beydon L, Desfontis J C, Ganster F, Petres J, Gautier F, Ferec S, Cailleux A, Dussaussoy C, Liu N, Chazot T, Fischler M, Gogny M
Pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU d'Angers, 49933 Angers cedex 9, France.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):650-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2009.05.014. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
This study in swine assessed BIS stability in response to decreases and increases in cardiac output under two propofol/remifentanil dosage combinations, both producing the same depth of surgical anaesthesia.
Eight anaesthetized-paralyzed ventilated adult swine were studied using a random-order cross-over design. Four received a P low/R high combination (P, 8.4+/-0.9 mg/kg/h; and R, 0.54+/-0.02 microg/kg/min) and then a P high/R low combination (P, 26.7+/-2.1mg/kg/h; and R, 0.34+/-0.01 microg/kg/min). The other four had these two combinations in the reverse order. Under each P/R combination, and after a 60-minutes steady state, a 15-minute stable cardiac tamponade was induced by intrapericardial gelatine infusion. Then, after returning to pre tamponade condition, a 15 minutes period with dobutamine was allowed.
Tamponade induced falls in average mean arterial pressure (MAP) (from 79+/-18 to 47+/-9 mm Hg; p<0.05) and cardiac output (Qc) (from 1.90+/-0.46 l/min to 1.20+/-0.38 l/min, p<0.05). Conversely, dobutamine increased both MAP and Qc (p<0.05). During each type of hemodynamic challenges, changes in anaesthesia depth as assessed by BIS differed dramatically between the two drug combinations, despite observing the same percent change in P and R effect-site concentration. With P high/R low and tamponade, BIS fell from 65+/-5 to 29+/-10 (p<0.05); dobutamine produced opposite effects. With P low/R high, in contrast, BIS was not influenced by either of the hemodynamic challenges.
Conversely to a high propofol/low remifentanil combination, a low propofol/high remifentanil combination allows constant anaesthetic depth in the face of haemodynamic challenges.
本研究在猪身上评估了在两种丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼剂量组合下,心输出量减少和增加时脑电双频指数(BIS)的稳定性,这两种组合均产生相同深度的外科麻醉。
使用随机交叉设计对8只麻醉、瘫痪并接受机械通气的成年猪进行研究。4只猪先接受低丙泊酚/高瑞芬太尼组合(丙泊酚,8.4±0.9mg/kg/h;瑞芬太尼,0.54±0.02μg/kg/min),然后接受高丙泊酚/低瑞芬太尼组合(丙泊酚,26.7±2.1mg/kg/h;瑞芬太尼,0.34±0.01μg/kg/min)。另外4只猪则按相反顺序接受这两种组合。在每种丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼组合下,经过60分钟的稳态后,通过心包内输注明胶诱导15分钟的稳定心脏压塞。然后,在恢复到压塞前状态后,给予多巴酚丁胺15分钟。
心脏压塞导致平均动脉压(MAP)下降(从79±18降至47±9mmHg;p<0.05)和心输出量(Qc)下降(从1.90±0.46L/min降至1.20±0.38L/min,p<0.05)。相反,多巴酚丁胺使MAP和Qc均升高(p<0.05)。在每种血流动力学挑战期间,尽管观察到丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼效应部位浓度的变化百分比相同,但通过BIS评估的麻醉深度变化在两种药物组合之间存在显著差异。使用高丙泊酚/低瑞芬太尼组合并进行心脏压塞时,BIS从65±5降至29±10(p<0.05);多巴酚丁胺产生相反的效果。相比之下,使用低丙泊酚/高瑞芬太尼组合时,BIS不受任何一种血流动力学挑战的影响。
与高丙泊酚/低瑞芬太尼组合相反,低丙泊酚/高瑞芬太尼组合在面对血流动力学挑战时可使麻醉深度保持恒定。