Ricci Mariella Lombardi
Faculty of Theology of Northern Italy, Turin.
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2009;15(1):7-27.
The article below is intended to reflect on whether or not a eugenic tendency constitutes an intrinsic element of human fertilization in vitro. The author outlines ideas and circumstances which characterized the foundation and propagation of eugenics between the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. A brief discussion follows on some of the standard procedures of in vitro fertilization, and in particular, those which manifest a trace or hint of eugenics--heterologous fertilization and sperm banking, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and embryo selection--practices which, nonetheless, are used on a large scale and shed light on both the essence of procreative medicine and on the current cultural environment. The objective of the article is to explore whether it is possible to eliminate the eugenic connotations without foregoing the benefits of technical and scientific progress.
以下文章旨在思考优生倾向是否构成体外受精的固有要素。作者概述了18世纪至19世纪优生学的创立和传播所具有的观念及情形。随后简要讨论了体外受精的一些标准程序,尤其是那些体现出优生学痕迹或暗示的程序——异体受精和精子库、植入前基因诊断(PGD)以及胚胎选择——尽管如此,这些程序仍被广泛应用,有助于揭示生殖医学的本质以及当前的文化环境。本文的目的是探讨在不放弃技术和科学进步带来的益处的情况下,是否有可能消除优生学内涵。