Kalady Matthew F, Sanchez Julian A, Manilich Elena, Hammel Jeff, Casey Graham, Church James M
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jun;52(6):1039-45. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819edbd4.
Colorectal cancers develop through various mechanisms such as chromosomal instability, DNA mismatch repair deficiency (microsatellite instability), and epigenetic DNA promoter methylation (CpG island methylator phenotype). This study evaluated the disparity in neoplastic changes between colon and rectal cancers.
A clinic-based colorectal frozen tumor bank at a single institution was queried for colon and rectal adenocarcinomas. Tumor DNA was extracted and analyzed for microsatellite instability, methylation, and mutations in the oncogenes KRAS and BRAF. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared.
The 268 patients with colon cancer and 89 with rectal cancer were similar in gender, tumor size, stage, and differentiation. Colon cancers had a higher incidence of microsatellite instability (27 percent) and methylator phenotype (28 percent) compared with rectal cancers (7 percent, 3 percent, respectively; P < 0.001). Although KRAS mutation rate was similar, colon cancers had a higher incidence of BRAF mutations (16.7 percent vs. 0 percent; P < 0.001). Microsatellite stable tumors had an increased risk of disease recurrence compared with microsatellite unstable tumors (odds ratio, 3.86). Despite overall differences in outcome between colon and rectal cancers, no significant difference in survival existed when similar molecular phenotypes were compared across anatomic sites.
Although colon cancers are molecularly heterogeneous, rectal cancers arise mostly via a single neoplastic pathway. Genetic and molecular differences influence prognosis more than anatomic location and suggest that oncogenic pathways contribute to survival differences between colon and rectal cancers.
结直肠癌通过多种机制发展,如染色体不稳定、DNA错配修复缺陷(微卫星不稳定)和表观遗传DNA启动子甲基化(CpG岛甲基化表型)。本研究评估了结肠癌和直肠癌在肿瘤变化方面的差异。
查询了单一机构基于临床的结直肠冷冻肿瘤库中的结肠癌和直肠癌。提取肿瘤DNA并分析微卫星不稳定、甲基化以及癌基因KRAS和BRAF的突变情况。比较患者的人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征和临床结局。
268例结肠癌患者和89例直肠癌患者在性别、肿瘤大小、分期和分化程度方面相似。与直肠癌(分别为7%、3%)相比,结肠癌的微卫星不稳定发生率(27%)和甲基化表型发生率(28%)更高(P<0.001)。虽然KRAS突变率相似,但结肠癌的BRAF突变发生率更高(16.7%对0%;P<0.001)。与微卫星不稳定肿瘤相比,微卫星稳定肿瘤的疾病复发风险增加(优势比,3.86)。尽管结肠癌和直肠癌在总体结局上存在差异,但在比较相似分子表型的不同解剖部位时,生存率无显著差异。
虽然结肠癌在分子水平上具有异质性,但直肠癌大多通过单一肿瘤发生途径产生。遗传和分子差异对预后的影响大于解剖位置,提示致癌途径导致了结肠癌和直肠癌在生存方面的差异。