Williams Christopher Alan, Hanan Niall, Scholes Robert J, Kutsch Werner
Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01610, USA.
Oecologia. 2009 Sep;161(3):469-80. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1405-y. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
The idea that many processes in arid and semi-arid ecosystems are dormant until activated by a pulse of rainfall, and then decay from a maximum rate as the soil dries, is widely used as a conceptual and mathematical model, but has rarely been evaluated with data. This paper examines soil water, evapotranspiration (ET), and net ecosystem CO2 exchange measured for 5 years at an eddy covariance tower sited in an Acacia-Combretum savanna near Skukuza in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. The analysis characterizes ecosystem flux responses to discrete rain events and evaluates the skill of increasingly complex "pulse models". Rainfall pulses exert strong control over ecosystem-scale water and CO2 fluxes at this site, but the simplest pulse models do a poor job of characterizing the dynamics of the response. Successful models need to include the time lag between the wetting event and the process peak, which differ for evaporation, photosynthesis and respiration. Adding further complexity, the time lag depends on the prior duration and degree of water stress. ET response is well characterized by a linear function of potential ET and a logistic function of profile-total soil water content, with remaining seasonal variation correlating with vegetation phenological dynamics (leaf area). A 1- to 3-day lag to maximal ET following wetting is a source of hysteresis in the ET response to soil water. Respiration responds to wetting within days, while photosynthesis takes a week or longer to reach its peak if the rainfall was preceded by a long dry spell. Both processes exhibit nonlinear functional responses that vary seasonally. We conclude that a more mechanistic approach than simple pulse modeling is needed to represent daily ecosystem C processes in semiarid savannas.
干旱和半干旱生态系统中的许多过程在降雨脉冲激活之前处于休眠状态,然后随着土壤变干从最大速率衰减,这一观点被广泛用作概念和数学模型,但很少用数据进行评估。本文研究了在南非克鲁格国家公园斯库库扎附近的金合欢-风车子稀树草原的一座涡度协方差塔上测量的5年土壤水分、蒸散量(ET)和生态系统净二氧化碳交换量。分析表征了生态系统通量对离散降雨事件的响应,并评估了日益复杂的“脉冲模型”的技能。降雨脉冲对该地点的生态系统尺度的水分和二氧化碳通量有很强的控制作用,但最简单的脉冲模型在表征响应动态方面表现不佳。成功的模型需要包括湿润事件与过程峰值之间的时间滞后,蒸发、光合作用和呼吸作用的时间滞后各不相同。更复杂的是,时间滞后取决于先前的水分胁迫持续时间和程度。ET响应可以很好地用潜在ET的线性函数和剖面总土壤含水量的逻辑函数来表征,其余的季节变化与植被物候动态(叶面积)相关。湿润后1至3天达到最大ET的滞后是ET对土壤水分响应中的滞后来源。呼吸作用在数天内对湿润做出响应,而如果降雨之前有长时间的干旱,光合作用则需要一周或更长时间才能达到峰值。这两个过程都表现出随季节变化的非线性功能响应。我们得出结论,需要一种比简单脉冲建模更具机理的方法来表征半干旱稀树草原中生态系统的每日碳过程。