Cross Nicholas B, Webster Angela C, Masson Philip, O'connell Philip J, Craig Jonathan C
Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Transplantation. 2009 Jul 15;88(1):7-18. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a9e960.
In nontransplant populations, effects of different antihypertensive drug classes vary. Relative effects in kidney transplant recipients are uncertain. We performed a systematic review including random effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, using Cochrane Collaboration methodology. We identified 60 trials, enrolling 3802 recipients. Twenty-nine trials (2262 patients) compared calcium channel blockers (CCB) with placebo or no treatment, 10 trials (445 patients) compared angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) with placebo or no treatment, and seven studies (405 patients) compared CCB with ACEi. CCB compared with placebo or no treatment (plus additional agents in either arm as required) reduced graft loss (risk ratio [RR] 0.75, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.57-0.99) and improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR; mean difference [MD] 4.5 mL/min, 95% CI 2.2-6.7). Data on ACEi versus placebo or no treatment were inconclusive for GFR (MD -8.1 mL/min, 95% CI -18.6-2.4) and inconsistent for graft loss, precluding meta-analysis. In direct comparison with CCB, ACEi decreased GFR (MD 11.5 mL/min, 95% CI 7.2-15.8), proteinuria (MD 0.28 g/day, 95% CI 0.10-0.47), hemoglobin (MD 11.5 g/L, 95% CI 7.2-15.8), and increased hyperkalemia (RR 3.7, 95% CI 1.9-7.7). Graft loss data were inconclusive (RR 7.4, 95% CI 0.4-140). These data suggest that CCB may be preferred as first-line agents for hypertensive kidney transplant recipients.
在非移植人群中,不同类别的抗高血压药物效果各异。肾移植受者中的相对效果尚不确定。我们采用Cochrane协作网方法进行了一项系统评价,包括对随机对照试验的随机效应荟萃分析。我们纳入了60项试验,共3802名受者。29项试验(2262例患者)比较了钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)与安慰剂或不治疗,10项试验(445例患者)比较了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)与安慰剂或不治疗,7项研究(405例患者)比较了CCB与ACEi。CCB与安慰剂或不治疗相比(根据需要在任一治疗组中加用其他药物)可降低移植肾丢失(风险比[RR]0.75,95%置信区间[CI]0.57 - 0.99)并改善肾小球滤过率(GFR;平均差[MD]4.5 mL/min,95%CI 2.2 - 6.7)。关于ACEi与安慰剂或不治疗比较的数据,对于GFR(MD - 8.1 mL/min,95%CI - 18.6 - 2.4)尚无定论,对于移植肾丢失的数据不一致,无法进行荟萃分析。与CCB直接比较时,ACEi可降低GFR(MD 11.5 mL/min,95%CI 7.2 - 15.8)、蛋白尿(MD 0.28 g/天,95%CI 0.10 - 0.47)、血红蛋白(MD 11.5 g/L,95%CI 7.2 - 15.8),并增加高钾血症发生率(RR 3.7,95%CI 1.9 - 7.7)。移植肾丢失的数据尚无定论(RR 7.4,95%CI 0.4 - 140)。这些数据表明,CCB可能更适合作为高血压肾移植受者的一线用药。