Suppr超能文献

检索尝试失败会增强后续学习。

Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.

作者信息

Kornell Nate, Hays Matthew Jensen, Bjork Robert A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):989-98. doi: 10.1037/a0015729.

Abstract

Taking tests enhances learning. But what happens when one cannot answer a test question-does an unsuccessful retrieval attempt impede future learning or enhance it? The authors examined this question using materials that ensured that retrieval attempts would be unsuccessful. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were asked fictional general-knowledge questions (e.g., "What peace treaty ended the Calumet War?"). In Experiments 3-6, participants were shown a cue word (e.g., whale) and were asked to guess a weak associate (e.g., mammal); the rare trials on which participants guessed the correct response were excluded from the analyses. In the test condition, participants attempted to answer the question before being shown the answer; in the read-only condition, the question and answer were presented together. Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhanced learning with both types of materials. These results demonstrate that retrieval attempts enhance future learning; they also suggest that taking challenging tests-instead of avoiding errors-may be one key to effective learning.

摘要

进行测试能促进学习。但当一个人无法回答测试问题时会发生什么呢?一次不成功的检索尝试会阻碍未来的学习还是会促进它呢?作者使用确保检索尝试会不成功的材料来研究这个问题。在实验1和实验2中,参与者被问到虚构的常识性问题(例如,“哪项和平条约结束了卡柳梅特战争?”)。在实验3 - 6中,向参与者展示一个提示词(例如,鲸鱼),并要求他们猜测一个弱相关词(例如,哺乳动物);参与者猜对正确答案的罕见试验被排除在分析之外。在测试条件下,参与者在看到答案之前尝试回答问题;在只读条件下,问题和答案一起呈现。对于这两种类型的材料,不成功的检索尝试都增强了学习效果。这些结果表明检索尝试能促进未来的学习;它们还表明进行具有挑战性的测试——而不是避免错误——可能是有效学习的一个关键。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验