van Die Margaret Diana, Teede Helena J, Bone Kerry M, Reece John E, Burger Henry G
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Menopause. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):792-6. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e318199d5e6.
The aim of this study was to evaluate predictors of the placebo response in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of a phytotherapeutic combination for the treatment of menopausal symptoms.
A post hoc analysis was conducted on data from 46 placebo participants completing the study. Variables at baseline were investigated for prediction of improvement on any of the endpoints of flushing, depression measured on the Hamilton Depression Inventory, and menopausal symptoms measured on the Greene Climacteric Scale. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were carried out on the individual endpoints, controlling for baseline scores. Multivariate linear regression analysis was also conducted on these three endpoints in combination.
Higher anxiety at study entry predicted placebo response on all three outcome measures individually (flushing: R = 0.33, P = 0.03; depression: R = 0.34, P < 0.001; and Greene Climacteric score: R = 0.24, P = 0.04); and in combination (P = 0.002), as did total Greene Climacteric scores at study entry (R = 0.24, P = 0.005). Improvement during nontreatment run-in predicted placebo response for depression (P = 0.005), menopausal symptoms (R = 0.28, P = 0.013), and the three combined endpoints (P = 0.015). Severity of scores at baseline predicted subsequent improvement on the Greene Climacteric scores only (r = 0.038, P = 0.009).
These findings may facilitate identification of potential placebo responders in future randomized controlled trials on menopausal symptoms and have relevance to study design in this context. Further research is required.
本研究旨在评估在一项用于治疗更年期症状的植物治疗组合的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验中,安慰剂反应的预测因素。
对完成该研究的46名安慰剂组参与者的数据进行事后分析。研究基线时的变量,以预测潮热、汉密尔顿抑郁量表测量的抑郁以及格林更年期量表测量的更年期症状等任何一个终点的改善情况。对各个终点进行分层线性回归分析,并对基线分数进行控制。还对这三个终点进行了联合多变量线性回归分析。
研究开始时较高的焦虑水平分别预测了所有三项结局指标的安慰剂反应(潮热:R = 0.33,P = 0.03;抑郁:R = 0.34,P < 0.001;格林更年期评分:R = 0.24,P = 0.04);联合起来也有预测作用(P = 0.002),研究开始时格林更年期量表的总分同样具有预测作用(R = 0.24,P = 0.005)。非治疗导入期的改善情况预测了抑郁的安慰剂反应(P = 0.005)、更年期症状的安慰剂反应(R = 0.28,P = 0.013)以及三个联合终点的安慰剂反应(P = 0.015)。基线时的评分严重程度仅预测了格林更年期评分随后的改善情况(r = 0.038,P = 0.009)。
这些发现可能有助于在未来关于更年期症状的随机对照试验中识别潜在的安慰剂反应者,并与该背景下的研究设计相关。需要进一步的研究。