Gervais P, Gervais A, De Beule R, Van der Bijl W
Acta Allergol. 1975 Nov;30(5):286-97.
In a double-blind trial lasting 2 weeks, a new, long-acting antihistamine, Mequitazine, and a placebo, were compared. 115 allergic patients participated in this experiment (mequitazine n = 56, placebo n = 59). Therapeutic results and the effect on diurnal alertness were evaluated by means of a questionnaire filled in daily by the patients. Whether considering the day by day results or the results of the entire treatment period, statistically, Mequitazine (10 mg/24 hrs) is very significantly more active than the placebo. The daytime drowsiness induced by Mequitazine is statistically no greater than that induced by the placebo, whether analyzed on a day by day basis or over the entire treatment period (P = 0.23). The side effects, 8 for Mequitazine, 5 for placebo, are mild and did not lead to discontinuation of the treatment in the Mequitazine group.
在一项为期2周的双盲试验中,对一种新型长效抗组胺药美喹他嗪和一种安慰剂进行了比较。115名过敏患者参与了该实验(美喹他嗪组n = 56,安慰剂组n = 59)。通过患者每日填写的问卷来评估治疗效果和对日间警觉性的影响。无论是考虑每日的结果还是整个治疗期的结果,从统计学角度来看,美喹他嗪(10毫克/24小时)比安慰剂的活性显著更高。无论按每日分析还是在整个治疗期分析,美喹他嗪引起的日间嗜睡在统计学上并不比安慰剂引起的更严重(P = 0.23)。美喹他嗪组出现8例副作用,安慰剂组出现5例,副作用均较轻微,未导致美喹他嗪组患者停药。