• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我牺牲型领导何时会激发亲社会行为?这取决于追随者的预防焦点。

When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers' prevention focus.

作者信息

De Cremer David, Mayer David M, van Dijke Marius, Bardes Mary, Schouten Barbara C

机构信息

Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):887-99. doi: 10.1037/a0014782.

DOI:10.1037/a0014782
PMID:19594232
Abstract

In the present set of studies, the authors examine the idea that self-sacrificial leadership motivates follower prosocial behavior, particularly among followers with a prevention focus. Drawing on the self-sacrificial leadership literature and regulatory focus theory, the authors provide results from 4 studies (1 laboratory and 3 field studies) that support the research hypothesis. Specifically, the relationship between self-sacrificial leadership and prosocial behavior (i.e., cooperation, organizational citizenship behavior) is stronger among followers who are high in prevention focus. Implications for the importance of taking a follower-centered approach to leadership are discussed.

摘要

在当前这组研究中,作者探讨了自我牺牲型领导激励追随者亲社会行为这一观点,尤其是在具有预防导向的追随者中。作者借鉴自我牺牲型领导的文献和调节焦点理论,提供了4项研究(1项实验室研究和3项实地研究)的结果,这些结果支持了研究假设。具体而言,在预防导向较高的追随者中,自我牺牲型领导与亲社会行为(即合作、组织公民行为)之间的关系更强。文中还讨论了以追随者为中心的领导方式的重要性。

相似文献

1
When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers' prevention focus.自我牺牲型领导何时会激发亲社会行为?这取决于追随者的预防焦点。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):887-99. doi: 10.1037/a0014782.
2
Good soldiers and good actors: prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors.优秀士兵与优秀演员:亲社会动机与印象管理动机作为亲和性公民行为的交互预测因素
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):900-12. doi: 10.1037/a0013770.
3
Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative.组织行为中的自我利益与他人导向:对工作绩效、亲社会行为和个人主动性的影响
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):913-26. doi: 10.1037/a0014494.
4
Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness.任务可行吗?具有亲社会动机的员工的表现取决于管理者的可信度。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):927-44. doi: 10.1037/a0014391.
5
The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective.主动人格在工作满意度和组织公民行为中的作用:关系视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):395-404. doi: 10.1037/a0018079.
6
Leaders as attachment figures: leaders' attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers' performance and mental health.作为依恋对象的领导者:领导者的依恋取向预测与领导相关的心理表征、追随者的绩效和心理健康。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;93(4):632-50. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.632.
7
Leader-follower values congruence: are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it?领导者-追随者价值观一致性:经社会化塑造的魅力型领导者是否更能实现这一点?
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):478-90. doi: 10.1037/a0014069.
8
Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem.作为自尊决定因素的奖励型领导和公平程序。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):3-12. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.3.
9
The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects.权威权力在解释程序公平效应中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):488-502. doi: 10.1037/a0018921.
10
Who is worthy of being followed? The impact of leaders' character and the moderating role of followers' personality.谁值得追随?领导者特质与追随者人格的调节作用。
J Psychol. 2014 May-Jun;148(3):347-85. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.801335.

引用本文的文献

1
Behaviour Change Techniques: An Application to Increase Employees' Willingness to Accept a Salary Reduction.行为改变技巧:一种提高员工接受减薪意愿的应用方法。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 10;14(10):924. doi: 10.3390/bs14100924.
2
Serve Yourself or Serve Your Students? How and When Supervisor Narcissism is Related to Mental Health of Graduate Students.服务自己还是服务学生?导师自恋如何以及何时与研究生心理健康相关。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Oct 15;17:3555-3571. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S480313. eCollection 2024.
3
Under the mask: The double-edged sword effect of leader self-sacrifice on employee work outcomes.
面具之下:领导者自我牺牲对员工工作成果的双刃剑效应。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 6;14:1052623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052623. eCollection 2023.
4
Can leader self-sacrificial behavior inhibit unethical pro-family behavior? A personal identification perspective.领导者的自我牺牲行为能抑制不道德的亲家族行为吗?一种个人认同视角。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1078122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1078122. eCollection 2022.
5
The Effect of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on Employees' Organisational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment: A Moderated Mediation Model.自我牺牲型领导对员工环境组织公民行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7450. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127450.
6
Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and regulatory focus at work in relation to strengths use and deficit correction in the workplace.在工作场所中,与优势利用和缺陷纠正有关的宏大和脆弱的自恋和监管焦点。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0258609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258609. eCollection 2021.
7
Motivation to Lead as Mediator of Relations Between the Dark Triad, Big Five, and Leadership Intention.作为黑暗人格三合一、大五人格与领导意图之间关系调解因素的领导动机。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 20;12:675347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675347. eCollection 2021.
8
Regulatory Fit Demonstrates That Prohibitive Voice Does Not Lead to Low Performance Evaluation.监管契合表明,禁止性声音并不会导致低绩效评估。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 26;11:581162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581162. eCollection 2020.
9
Creating a safe haven during the crisis: How organizations can achieve deep compliance with COVID-19 safety measures in the hospitality industry.在危机期间打造一个安全空间:组织如何在酒店业深度遵守新冠疫情安全措施。
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102662. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
10
Engaging in prosocial behavior explains how high self-control relates to more life satisfaction: Evidence from three Chinese samples.参与亲社会行为解释了高自我控制如何与更高的生活满意度相关:来自三个中国样本的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 14;14(10):e0223169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223169. eCollection 2019.