Garcia Eugenio J, Gomes Osnara M M, Gomes João C
School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2009;22(1):57-62.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of three adhesive systems to superficial and deep dentine using the microtensile bond strength test (microTBS). The occlusal enamel of thirty human third molars was removed to expose a flat surface of superficial or deep dentin. For each type of surface, the test specimens were randomly divided into three groups which underwent the application of a conventional two-step adhesive system [Single Bond (SB)] as the control group (n=10), a two-bottle self-etching system [One Coat SE Bond (OCSE)] (n=10) and a one bottle one-step system [Clearfil S3 Bond (CFS3)] (n=10). Adhesives were applied, a 5-mm high "crown" as built-up with resin composite Z250 (3M) and the specimens with a cross-sectional area of 0.7 +/- 0.1 mm2 were tested in tension (0.5 mm/min). Four fractured sticks from each tooth were randomly selected and the dentin side was gently abraded with a 1200-grit SiC paper etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 s and air dried. SEM micrographs at 70X and 2400X magnification were taken using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to calculate the area of tubular dentin (ATD) and tubular density (TD) with Image Pro Plus 5. Two-way ANOVA (dentin depth-adhesive) showed higher bond strength values for SB. However the values did not depend on dentin depth. Linear regression showed a significant relationship between bond strength and area of intertubular dentin for SB (p = 0.004), and a significant inverse relationship between tubular density and bond strength for CFS3 (p = 0.009). OCSE exhibited a tendency that was similar to SB and opposite to CFS3, but was not statistically significant. The conventional two-step adhesive had higher bond strength values. The use of digital image analysis facilitates the manipulation of data and contributes to the interpretation of the behavior of new adhesive systems.
本研究的目的是使用微拉伸粘结强度测试(microTBS)评估三种粘结系统对表层和深层牙本质的粘结强度。去除30颗人第三磨牙的咬合面釉质,以暴露表层或深层牙本质的平坦表面。对于每种类型的表面,将测试样本随机分为三组,分别应用传统的两步法粘结系统[单键(SB)]作为对照组(n = 10)、双瓶自酸蚀系统[一层SE粘结剂(OCSE)](n = 10)和单瓶一步法系统[Clearfil S3粘结剂(CFS3)](n = 10)。施加粘结剂,用树脂复合材料Z250(3M)构建一个5毫米高的“冠”,并对横截面面积为0.7±0.1平方毫米的样本进行拉伸测试(0.5毫米/分钟)。从每颗牙齿中随机选择4根断裂的样本条,用1200目碳化硅砂纸轻轻打磨牙本质侧,并用35%磷酸蚀刻15秒,然后空气干燥。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)在70倍和2400倍放大倍数下拍摄SEM显微照片,并用Image Pro Plus 5计算管周牙本质面积(ATD)和管密度(TD)。双向方差分析(牙本质深度-粘结剂)显示SB的粘结强度值更高。然而,这些值并不取决于牙本质深度。线性回归显示,SB的粘结强度与管间牙本质面积之间存在显著关系(p = 0.004),CFS3的管密度与粘结强度之间存在显著负相关(p = 0.009)。OCSE表现出与SB相似且与CFS3相反的趋势,但无统计学意义。传统的两步法粘结剂具有更高的粘结强度值。数字图像分析的使用有助于数据处理,并有助于解释新型粘结系统的行为。